Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 17;19(1):366.
doi: 10.1186/s12951-021-01111-z.

Quantitative assessment of AD markers using naked eyes: point-of-care testing with paper-based lateral flow immunoassay

Affiliations

Quantitative assessment of AD markers using naked eyes: point-of-care testing with paper-based lateral flow immunoassay

Liding Zhang et al. J Nanobiotechnology. .

Abstract

42 is one of the most extensively studied blood and Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for the diagnosis of symptomatic and prodromal Alzheimer's disease (AD). Because of the heterogeneity and transient nature of Aβ42 oligomers (Aβ42Os), the development of technologies for dynamically detecting changes in the blood or CSF levels of Aβ42 monomers (Aβ42Ms) and Aβ42Os is essential for the accurate diagnosis of AD. The currently commonly used Aβ42 ELISA test kits usually mis-detected the elevated Aβ42Os, leading to incomplete analysis and underestimation of soluble Aβ42, resulting in a comprised performance in AD diagnosis. Herein, we developed a dual-target lateral flow immunoassay (dLFI) using anti-Aβ42 monoclonal antibodies 1F12 and 2C6 for the rapid and point-of-care detection of Aβ42Ms and Aβ42Os in blood samples within 30 min for AD diagnosis. By naked eye observation, the visual detection limit of Aβ42Ms or/and Aβ42Os in dLFI was 154 pg/mL. The test results for dLFI were similar to those observed in the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Therefore, this paper-based dLFI provides a practical and rapid method for the on-site detection of two biomarkers in blood or CSF samples without the need for additional expertise or equipment.

Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; Aβ42 monomer; Aβ42 oligomer; Blood; Gold nanoparticle; Magnetic nanoparticles; Paper-based lateral flow immunoassay.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

Figures

Scheme 1
Scheme 1
The principle and test procedure of dLFI. a The blood samples were enriched by the mAb 1F12-modified MNPs and then eluted for dLFI analysis. Schematic representation of the working principle of the dLFI for the detection of Aβ42Os (b), Aβ42Ms (c), Aβ42Ms and Aβ42Os (d), or without Aβ42Ms or/and Aβ42Os (e)
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Characterization of conformation-specific antibodies for Aβ42Ms and Aβ42Os. a Confocal fluorescence images of mouse 5xFAD brain sections using Cy3-labeled anti-Aβ42 monoclonal antibody 1F12 or 2C6 and thioflavin S. (Scale bar: 500 μm). b Parallel analysis of the morphology of Aβ42Ms and Aβ42Os by cryo-transmission electron microscopy. (Scale bar: 500 nm). The SDS-PAGE (c) and Western blotting (d) analysis of the prepared Aβ42Ms and Aβ42Os using 1F12 or 2C6. The binding selectivity of 1F12 (e) and 2C6 (f) to Aβ42 and Aβ40 was determined by competitive ELISA. g The logIC50 value of 1F12 or 2C6 to Aβ42 and Aβ40. The data are presented as means ± SD, n = 3 in e and f. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for multigroup comparisons. Statistical significance is indicated in the figures by ****p < 0.0001
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Characterization of AuNP–1F12 conjugates. a TEM images of synthetic AuNP. (Scale bar: 200 nm). b The size distributions of AuNP before and after modification. c A 12% reduced SDS-PAGE gel analysis of AuNP–1F12 and 1F12. d ELISA was used to determine the bioactivity of AuNP–1F12 conjugates. The optimal volume of K2CO3 for the conjugation of 1F12 with AuNP was evaluated by the color (e) and OD525 value (g). The color (f) and OD525 value (h) were used to evaluate the optimal concentration of 1F12 of synthetic AuNP-1F12. For Fig. 3b, d, g, and h, the data are presented as mean ± SD, n = 3. Statistical significance is indicated in the figures by n.s. (indicating no significance)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The performance of the dLFI. The visual result (a) and gray value (c) on the T line of the dLFI in the specificity assay, n = 3. b The sensitivity of dLFI for the simultaneous detection of Aβ42Ms and Aβ42Os. d The plotted linear curve of different Aβ42 conformations, n = 3. e, f Correlation between results from dLFI (Y-axis) and sandwich ELISA (X-axis) in spiked samples, n = 12. Data are presented as means ± SD. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for multigroup comparisons. Statistical significance is represented in the figures by ****p < 0.0001 and n.s. (indicating no significance)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Simultaneous detection of Aβ42Ms and Aβ42Os in the blood of 3- and 9-month-old 5xFAD and C57BL/6 J mice. The visual results (a) and grey value (b, c) on the T-line of the dLFI in blood samples from 5xFAD (n = 8) and C57BL/6 J (n = 6) mice at 3 and 9 months old. d, e Correlation between blood Aβ42Os level and Aβ plaque area (d, p < 0.0001) or soluble Aβ42 level (e, p < 0.0001) in the brain of 5xFAD mice, a total of n = 25, of which n = 5 in each age group, including 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months old. f Confocal fluorescence images of Aβ plaques and Iba 1-positive cell staining in 3 or 9-month-old 5xFAD mice. (Scale bar: 100 μm). Data are presented as means ± SD. Unpaired t-test was used for two-group comparisons. Statistical significance is indicated in the figures by **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 and n.s. (indicating no significance)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Characterization of antibody-modified NHS-magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs). a Schematic illustration of the working steps for the use of antibody-modified MNPs for the enrichment of Aβ42Os and/or Aβ42Ms. b A 12% reduced SDS-PAGE gel analysis of 1F12-MNPs. 1F12 and NMNs were used as controls. ELISA (c) and IP-Western blotting (d) analysis for the bioactivity of 1F12-MNPs. Data are presented as means ± SD, n = 3 in c
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Detection of Aβ42Ms and/or Aβ42Os in human blood samples by dLFI. The visual results (a) and grey value (b) of the Aβ42Ms and/or Aβ42Os level in the blood of AD patients (n = 8) or healthy controls (n = 7) were analyzed by dLFI. c The Aβ42Ms and/or Aβ42Os levels in the blood of AD patients (n = 8) or healthy controls (n = 7) were detected by sandwich ELISA. d Total Aβ42 levels in human blood samples were detected by sandwich ELISA (n = 8 for AD patients and n = 7 for healthy controls). Data are presented as means ± SD. Unpaired t-test was used for two-group comparisons. Statistical significance is indicated in the figures by *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and n.s. (indicating no significance)

References

    1. McDade E, Bateman RJ. Stop Alzheimer’s before it starts. Nature. 2017;547:153–155. - PubMed
    1. Lane CA, Hardy J, Schott JM. Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Neurol. 2018;25:59–70. doi: 10.1111/ene.13439. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blennow K, de Leon MJ, Zetterberg H. Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet. 2006;368:387–403. - PubMed
    1. Ittner LM, Gotz J. Amyloid-beta and tau—a toxic pas de deux in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12:65–72. - PubMed
    1. Citron M. Strategies for disease modification in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004;5:677–685. - PubMed