Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Nov 17:375:e068302.
doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-068302.

Effectiveness of public health measures in reducing the incidence of covid-19, SARS-CoV-2 transmission, and covid-19 mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effectiveness of public health measures in reducing the incidence of covid-19, SARS-CoV-2 transmission, and covid-19 mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis

Stella Talic et al. BMJ. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Objective: To review the evidence on the effectiveness of public health measures in reducing the incidence of covid-19, SARS-CoV-2 transmission, and covid-19 mortality.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources: Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Biosis, Joanna Briggs, Global Health, and World Health Organization COVID-19 database (preprints).

Eligibility criteria for study selection: Observational and interventional studies that assessed the effectiveness of public health measures in reducing the incidence of covid-19, SARS-CoV-2 transmission, and covid-19 mortality.

Main outcome measures: The main outcome measure was incidence of covid-19. Secondary outcomes included SARS-CoV-2 transmission and covid-19 mortality.

Data synthesis: DerSimonian Laird random effects meta-analysis was performed to investigate the effect of mask wearing, handwashing, and physical distancing measures on incidence of covid-19. Pooled effect estimates with corresponding 95% confidence intervals were computed, and heterogeneity among studies was assessed using Cochran's Q test and the I2 metrics, with two tailed P values.

Results: 72 studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 35 evaluated individual public health measures and 37 assessed multiple public health measures as a "package of interventions." Eight of 35 studies were included in the meta-analysis, which indicated a reduction in incidence of covid-19 associated with handwashing (relative risk 0.47, 95% confidence interval 0.19 to 1.12, I2=12%), mask wearing (0.47, 0.29 to 0.75, I2=84%), and physical distancing (0.75, 0.59 to 0.95, I2=87%). Owing to heterogeneity of the studies, meta-analysis was not possible for the outcomes of quarantine and isolation, universal lockdowns, and closures of borders, schools, and workplaces. The effects of these interventions were synthesised descriptively.

Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that several personal protective and social measures, including handwashing, mask wearing, and physical distancing are associated with reductions in the incidence covid-19. Public health efforts to implement public health measures should consider community health and sociocultural needs, and future research is needed to better understand the effectiveness of public health measures in the context of covid-19 vaccination.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42020178692.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/disclosure-of-interest/and declare: ET is supported by a Cancer Research UK Career Development Fellowship and XZ is supported by The Darwin Trust of Edinburgh; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; and no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Flow of articles through the review. WHO=World Health Organization
Fig 2
Fig 2
Summary of risk of bias across studies assessing individual measures using risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) tool
Fig 3
Fig 3
Meta-analysis of evidence on association between handwashing and incidence of covid-19 using modified Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman adjusted random effect model
Fig 4
Fig 4
Meta-analysis of evidence on association between handwashing and incidence of covid-19 using unadjusted random effect model
Fig 5
Fig 5
Meta-analysis of evidence on association between mask wearing and incidence of covid-19 using unadjusted random effect model
Fig 6
Fig 6
Meta-analysis of evidence on association between physical distancing and incidence of covid-19 using unadjusted random effect model
None

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McKee M, Stuckler D. If the world fails to protect the economy, COVID-19 will damage health not just now but also in the future. Nat Med 2020;26:640-2. 10.1038/s41591-020-0863-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. 2021. https://covid19.who.int/
    1. Parodi SM, Liu VX. From Containment to Mitigation of COVID-19 in the US. JAMA 2020;323:1441-2. 10.1001/jama.2020.3882. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bernal JL, Andrews N, Gower C, et al. . Early effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination with BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine and ChAdOx1 adenovirus vector vaccine on symptomatic disease, hospitalisations and mortality in older adults in England. medRxiv 2021:2021.03.01.21252652.
    1. Chodick G, Tene L, Patalon T, et al. . Assessment of Effectiveness of 1 Dose of BNT162b2 Vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 Infection 13 to 24 Days After Immunization. JAMA Netw Open 2021;4:e2115985. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.15985. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances