Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Nov;27(11):1885-1892.
doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01552-x. Epub 2021 Nov 17.

Reporting guidelines for human microbiome research: the STORMS checklist

Chloe Mirzayi  1 Audrey Renson  2 Genomic Standards ConsortiumMassive Analysis and Quality Control SocietyFatima Zohra  1 Shaimaa Elsafoury  1 Ludwig Geistlinger  1 Lora J Kasselman  1 Kelly Eckenrode  1 Janneke van de Wijgert  3 Amy Loughman  4 Francine Z Marques  5 David A MacIntyre  6 Manimozhiyan Arumugam  7 Rimsha Azhar  1 Francesco Beghini  8 Kirk Bergstrom  9 Ami Bhatt  10 Jordan E Bisanz  11 Jonathan Braun  12 Hector Corrada Bravo  13 Gregory A Buck  14 Frederic Bushman  15 David Casero  16 Gerard Clarke  17 Maria Carmen Collado  18 Paul D Cotter  19   20   21 John F Cryan  20   22 Ryan T Demmer  23 Suzanne Devkota  16 Eran Elinav  24   25 Juan S Escobar  26 Jennifer Fettweis  14 Robert D Finn  27 Anthony A Fodor  28 Sofia Forslund  29 Andre Franke  30 Cesare Furlanello  31 Jack Gilbert  32 Elizabeth Grice  33 Benjamin Haibe-Kains  34 Scott Handley  35 Pamela Herd  36 Susan Holmes  37 Jonathan P Jacobs  38 Lisa Karstens  39 Rob Knight  40 Dan Knights  41   42 Omry Koren  43 Douglas S Kwon  44 Morgan Langille  45 Brianna Lindsay  46 Dermot McGovern  16 Alice C McHardy  47 Shannon McWeeney  48 Noel T Mueller  49 Luigi Nezi  50 Matthew Olm  51 Noah Palm  52 Edoardo Pasolli  53 Jeroen Raes  54 Matthew R Redinbo  55 Malte Rühlemann  56 R Balfour Sartor  57 Patrick D Schloss  58 Lynn Schriml  59 Eran Segal  60 Michelle Shardell  59 Thomas Sharpton  61 Ekaterina Smirnova  62 Harry Sokol  63 Justin L Sonnenburg  51 Sujatha Srinivasan  64 Louise B Thingholm  56 Peter J Turnbaugh  65 Vaibhav Upadhyay  65 Ramona L Walls  66 Paul Wilmes  67   68 Takuji Yamada  69 Georg Zeller  70 Mingyu Zhang  49 Ni Zhao  71 Liping Zhao  72 Wenjun Bao  73 Aedin Culhane  74 Viswanath Devanarayan  75 Joaquin Dopazo  76 Xiaohui Fan  77 Matthias Fischer  78   79 Wendell Jones  80 Rebecca Kusko  81 Christopher E Mason  82 Tim R Mercer  83 Susanna-Assunta Sansone  84 Andreas Scherer  85 Leming Shi  86 Shraddha Thakkar  87 Weida Tong  88 Russ Wolfinger  89 Christopher Hunter  90 Nicola Segata  8   50 Curtis Huttenhower #  91 Jennifer B Dowd #  92 Heidi E Jones #  1 Levi Waldron #  93
Collaborators, Affiliations
Review

Reporting guidelines for human microbiome research: the STORMS checklist

Chloe Mirzayi et al. Nat Med. 2021 Nov.

Abstract

The particularly interdisciplinary nature of human microbiome research makes the organization and reporting of results spanning epidemiology, biology, bioinformatics, translational medicine and statistics a challenge. Commonly used reporting guidelines for observational or genetic epidemiology studies lack key features specific to microbiome studies. Therefore, a multidisciplinary group of microbiome epidemiology researchers adapted guidelines for observational and genetic studies to culture-independent human microbiome studies, and also developed new reporting elements for laboratory, bioinformatics and statistical analyses tailored to microbiome studies. The resulting tool, called 'Strengthening The Organization and Reporting of Microbiome Studies' (STORMS), is composed of a 17-item checklist organized into six sections that correspond to the typical sections of a scientific publication, presented as an editable table for inclusion in supplementary materials. The STORMS checklist provides guidance for concise and complete reporting of microbiome studies that will facilitate manuscript preparation, peer review, and reader comprehension of publications and comparative analysis of published results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
STORMS checklist items by major manuscript heading. For detailed descriptions of each item and additional guidance, see the STORMS checklist (Table S1).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Examples of flowcharts for item 3.6.
Though not required by STORMS, flowcharts can help visualize how the final analytic sample was calculated.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wirbel J et al. Meta-analysis of fecal metagenomes reveals global microbial signatures that are specific for colorectal cancer. Nat. Med 25, 679–689 (2019). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Simoneau J, Dumontier S, Gosselin R & Scott MS Current RNA-seq methodology reporting limits reproducibility. Brief. Bioinform doi: 10.1093/bib/bbz124. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ten Hoopen P et al. The metagenomic data life-cycle: standards and best practices. GigaScience 6, 1–11 (2017). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yilmaz P et al. Minimum information about a marker gene sequence (MIMARKS) and minimum information about any (x) sequence (MIxS) specifications. Nat. Biotechnol 29, 415–420 (2011). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moher D, Jones A, Lepage L & Group, for the C. Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials: A Comparative Before-and-After Evaluation. JAMA 285, 1992–1995 (2001). - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms