Endoscopic ultrasound-guided vascular interventions: Current insights and emerging techniques
- PMID: 34790012
- PMCID: PMC8567466
- DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i40.6874
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided vascular interventions: Current insights and emerging techniques
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is one of the significant breakthroughs in the field of advanced endoscopy. In the last two decades, EUS has evolved from a diagnostic tool to a real-time therapeutic modality. The luminal gastrointestinal (GI) tract provides a unique opportunity to access multiple vascular structures, especially in the mediastinum and abdomen, thus permitting a variety of EUS-guided vascular interventions. The addition of the doppler and contrast-enhanced capability to EUS has further helped provide real-time visualization of blood flow in vessels through the GI tract. EUS-guided vascular interventions rely on standard endoscopic accessories and interventional tools such as fine-needle aspiration needles and fine-needle biopsy. EUS allows the visualization of various structures in real-time by differentiating tissue densities and vascularity, thus, avoiding radiation exposure. EUS-guided techniques also allow real-time microscopic examination after target biopsy. Furthermore, many necessary interventions can be done during the same procedure after diagnosis. This article provides an overview of EUS-guided vascular interventions such as variceal, non-variceal bleeding interventions, EUSguided portal vein (PV) access with the formation of an intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, and techniques related to diagnosis of GI malignancies. Furthermore, we discuss current insights and future outlook of therapeutic modalities like PV embolization, PV sampling, angiography, drug administration, and portal pressure measurement.
Keywords: Endoscopic ultrasound; Esophageal varices; Gastric varices; Portal vein; Therapeutic endoscopy; Vascular intervention.
©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict-of-interest statement: Rupinder Mann, Hemant Goyal, Abhilash Perisetti, Saurabh Chandan, Sumant Inamdar has nothing to disclose; Benjamin Tharian acts as a consultant to Boston Scientific and Medtronic which are not relevant for this manuscript.
Figures
References
-
- Deprez PH. Choice of endosonographic equipment and normal endosonographic anatomy. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;23:623–637. - PubMed
-
- Burmester E, Tiede U. Longitudinal Endoscopic Ultrasound–Anatomical Guiding Structures in the Upper Abdomen (Cranial–Right) J Enc GI End. 2013;1:501–504.
-
- Snady H. Identification of major retroperitoneal vascular anatomy with endoscopic ultrasonography. Acta Endosc. 1995;25:491–498.
-
- DiMagno EP, DiMagno MJ. Endoscopic Ultrasonography: From the Origins to Routine EUS. Dig Dis Sci. 2016;61:342–353. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
