Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Oct;12(5):2475-2483.
doi: 10.21037/jgo-21-119.

Selecting surgical candidates with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a review for modern pancreatology

Affiliations
Review

Selecting surgical candidates with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a review for modern pancreatology

Y H Andrew Wu et al. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is likely to become the second leading cause of malignancy-associated mortality within the next 10 years and surgery remains the best hope for cure. The introduction of effective neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) has increased the resection rate of PC in the era of contemporary pancreatology. This review summarizes the surgical selection criteria for locally advanced PC (LAPC), by focusing on the commonly used predictors for resectability and better overall survival outcome. Based on the currently available evidence, the role of change in carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) and patient's tumor response to NAT are critical in surgical candidacy selection. Although, consensus on surgical candidacy selection for LAPC still needs to be made, several data have shown that surgery provides the most optimistic chance of cure for PC. Surgery is, therefore, recommended whenever the benefits of pancreatectomy outweigh surgical complications, and the chance of local or distant metastases in the postoperative setting is low. This review also provided our insight for and experience in selecting surgical candidates by focusing on optimizing the overall survival of LAPC patients. Nevertheless, a collaborative approach to formulating standardized criteria for surgical candidate selection and treatment guidelines for LAPC is a common goal that pancreatologists worldwide should focus on.

Keywords: Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC); borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (borderline resectable PC); carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9); neoadjuvant treatment (NAT); resectability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/10.21037/jgo-21-119). The series “Surgery for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. Dr. MDC is a co-principal investigator on a Boston Scientific study investigating the role of intraoperative pancreatoscopy in IPMN patients. Dr. MDC has also been awarded an industry grant from Haemonetics Inc. to conduct a multicenter study that evaluates the prognostic implications and changes of thromboelastographic (TEG) in pancreas cancer patients. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

References

    1. Neoptolemos JP, Kleeff J, Michl P, et al. Therapeutic developments in pancreatic cancer: current and future perspectives. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;15:333-48. 10.1038/s41575-018-0005-x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, et al. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res 2014;74:2913-21. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0155 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Huang L, Jansen L, Balavarca Y, et al. Resection of pancreatic cancer in Europe and USA: an international large-scale study highlighting large variations. Gut 2019;68:130-9. 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314828 - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (version 1. 2020). Available online: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/pancreatic_blocks.pdf (Accessed November 26, 2019).
    1. Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, et al. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 2011;364:1817-25. 10.1056/NEJMoa1011923 - DOI - PubMed