Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 1;187(7-8):179-185.
doi: 10.1093/milmed/usab458.

Optimizing the Impact of Pragmatic Clinical Trials for Veteran and Military Populations: Lessons From the Pain Management Collaboratory

Affiliations

Optimizing the Impact of Pragmatic Clinical Trials for Veteran and Military Populations: Lessons From the Pain Management Collaboratory

Joseph Ali et al. Mil Med. .

Abstract

Pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) are well-suited to address unmet healthcare needs, such as those arising from the dual public health crises of chronic pain and opioid misuse, recently exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. These overlapping epidemics have complex, multifactorial etiologies, and PCTs can be used to investigate the effectiveness of integrated therapies that are currently available but underused. Yet individual pragmatic studies can be limited in their reach because of existing structural and cultural barriers to dissemination and implementation. The National Institutes of Health, Department of Defense, and Department of Veterans Affairs formed an interagency research partnership, the Pain Management Collaboratory. The partnership combines pragmatic trial design with collaborative tools and relationship building within a large network to advance the science and impact of nonpharmacological approaches and integrated models of care for the management of pain and common co-occurring conditions. The Pain Management Collaboratory team supports 11 large-scale, multisite PCTs in veteran and military health systems with a focus on team science with the shared aim that the "whole is greater than the sum of the parts." Herein, we describe this integrated approach and lessons learned, including incentivizing all parties; proactively offering frequent opportunities for problem-solving; engaging stakeholders during all stages of research; and navigating competing research priorities. We also articulate several specific strategies and their practical implications for advancing pain management in active clinical, "real-world," settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Institute of Medicine : Relieving Pain in America: A Blueprint for Transforming Prevention, Care, Education, and Research. Washington, DC, 2011. Available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK91497/; accessed May 8, 2020.
    1. Rice ASC, Smith BH, Blyth FM: Pain and the global burden of disease. Pain 2016; 157(4): 791–6. - PubMed
    1. Dahlhamer J, Lucas J, Zelaya C, et al.: Prevalence of chronic pain and high-impact chronic pain among adults—United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2018; 67(36): 1001–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Toblin RL, Quartana PJ, Riviere LA, et al.: Chronic pain and opioid use in U.S. soldiers after combat deployment. JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174(8): 1400–1. - PubMed
    1. Department of Health and Human Services : National Pain Strategy: a comprehensive population health-level strategy for pain. 2016. Available at https://www.iprcc.nih.gov/sites/default/files/HHSNational_Pain_Strategy_...; accessed May 8, 2020.

Publication types