Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Jul;34(7):e14291.
doi: 10.1111/nmo.14291. Epub 2021 Nov 18.

Effect of amino acid-based formula added to four-food elimination in adult eosinophilic esophagitis patients: A randomized clinical trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of amino acid-based formula added to four-food elimination in adult eosinophilic esophagitis patients: A randomized clinical trial

Willemijn E de Rooij et al. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Elimination of key foods restricts dietary options in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) patients. Addition of amino acid-based formula (AAF) to an elimination diet might facilitate adherence and, therefore, enhance efficacy of dietary management.

Aim: To evaluate whether addition of AAF to a four-food elimination diet (FFED) is more effective than FFED alone in decreasing eosinophilia, endoscopic signs, and clinical outcomes.

Methods: This randomized controlled trial enrolled 41 adult patients with active EoE (≥15 eosinophils (eos) per high power field (hpf)) at baseline biopsy. Subjects were randomized (1:1 ratio) to groups given a FFED or FFED with addition of AAF providing 30% of their daily energy needs (FFED + AAF). Histological disease activity, endoscopic signs, symptoms, and disease-related quality of life (EoEQoL) were measured at baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention.

Results: Patients (60% male, age 34.5 (interquartile range (IQR) 29-42.8 years)) were randomized to FFED (n = 20) or FFED + AAF (n = 21); 40 participants completed the diet. Complete histological remission (<15 eos/hpf) was achieved in 48% of FFED + AAF subjects (n = 21) vs. 25% of FFED subjects (n = 20), respectively (p = 0.204). Peak eosinophil counts (PEC) decreased significantly in both groups between baseline and week 6, but the change in PEC between groups was not different (p = 0.130). A significant but similar endoscopic and symptomatic reduction was observed in both groups (all; p<0.05). Total EoEQoL scores significantly improved in the FFED + AAF group between baseline and week 6 (p = 0.007), and not in the FFED group.

Conclusion: The addition of AAF to a FFED did not lead to a larger decrease in PEC between baseline and 6 weeks, but may result in a significant improvement of QoL in adult EoE patients NL6014 (NTR6778).

Keywords: elemental diet; elimination diet; eosinophilic esophagitis; esophageal eosinophilia and allergy; quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
| Flow chart demonstrating the number of patients who were eligible for participation, randomization, and ITT analysis. In addition, all patients who discontinued the trial or were switched to the FFED group for final PP analyses are presented. FFED, Four‐food elimination diet; ITT, Intention to treat; PP, Per protocol
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
| Histological outcome measures (ITT cohort): (A) peak eosinophil count (eos/hpf) pre‐/post‐treatment and between groups; and (B) post‐treatment proportion (%) of patients in complete‐/partial‐/no histological remission between groups. Complete histological remission = Rate of patients with complete histological remission at week 6 (<15 eos/hpf), partial histological remission = Rate of patients with partial histological remission at week 6 (≥50% reduction in pre‐treatment eos/hpf), and no histological remission = Rate of patients with no histological remission at week 6., eos, Eosinophils; hpf, High power field; ITT, Intention to treat
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
| Endoscopic and Symptom outcome measures (ITT‐cohort): (A) EREFS pre‐/post‐treatment and between groups; (B) SDI‐PRO measure score pre‐/post‐treatment and between groups; and (C) EoEQoL pre‐/post‐treatment and between groups. EREFS, Endoscopic Reference score; ITT, Intention to treat; SDI, Straumann Dysphagia Instrument

References

    1. Furuta GT, Liacouras CA, Collins MH, et al. Eosinophilic esophagitis in children and adults: a systematic review and consensus recommendations for diagnosis and treatment. sponsored by the american gastroenterological association (AGA) Institute and North American society of pediatric gastroenterol. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:1342‐1363. - PubMed
    1. Liacouras CA, Furuta GT, Hirano I, et al. Eosinophilic esophagitis: updated consensus recommendations for children and adults. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;128:3‐20. - PubMed
    1. Attwood S, Smyrk T, Demeester T, Jones J. Eosophageal eosinophilia with dysphagia. a distinct clincopathological syndrome. J Dig Dis. 1993;38:109‐116. - PubMed
    1. Navarro P, Arias Á, Arias‐González L, Laserna‐Mendieta EJ, Ruiz‐Ponce M, Lucendo AJ, et al. Systematic review with meta‐analysis: the growing incidence and prevalence of eosinophilic oesophagitis in children and adults in population‐based studies. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019;49:1116‐1125. - PubMed
    1. Dellon ES, Erichsen R, Baron JA, et al. The increasing incidence and prevalence of eosinophilic oesophagitis outpaces changes in endoscopic and biopsy practice: national population‐based estimates from Denmark. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015;41:662‐670. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Supplementary concepts

Associated data