Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 18;16(11):e0259887.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259887. eCollection 2021.

Effect of after action review on safety culture and second victim experience and its implementation in an Irish hospital: A mixed methods study protocol

Siobhán E McCarthy  1 , Theresa Keane  1 , Aisling Walsh  2 , Lisa Mellon  3 , David J Williams  4 , Loretta Jenkins  5 , Catherine Hogan  5 , Cornelia Stuart  5 , Natasha Rafter  6
Affiliations

Effect of after action review on safety culture and second victim experience and its implementation in an Irish hospital: A mixed methods study protocol

Siobhán E McCarthy et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: After Action Review is a form of facilitated team learning and review of events. The methodology originated in the United States Army and forms part of the Incident Management Framework in the Irish Health Services. After Action Review has been hypothesized to improve safety culture and the effect of patient safety events on staff (second victim experience) in health care settings. Yet little direct evidence exists to support this and its implementation has not been studied.

Aim: To investigate the effect of After Action Review on safety culture and second victim experience and to examine After Action Review implementation in a hospital setting.

Methods: A mixed methods study will be conducted at an Irish hospital. To assess the effect on safety culture and second victim experience, hospital staff will complete surveys before and twelve months after the introduction of After Action Review to the hospital (Hospital Survey on Safety Culture 2.0 and Second Victim Experience and Support Tool). Approximately one in twelve staff will be trained as After Action Review Facilitators using a simulation based training programme. Six months after the After Action Review training, focus groups will be conducted with a stratified random sample of the trained facilitators. These will explore enablers and barriers to implementation using the Theoretical Domains Framework. At twelve months, information will be collected from the trained facilitators and the hospital to establish the quality and resource implications of implementing After Action Review.

Discussion: The results of the study will directly inform local hospital decision-making and national and international approaches to incorporating After Action Review in hospitals and other healthcare settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Study conceptual framework of effect of AAR on safety culture and second victim experience.
Source: Conceptual Model adapted from Proctor et al. [33].
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Slawomirski L, Auraaen A, Klazinga NS. The economics of patient safety: Strengthening a value-based approach to reducing patient harm at national level. OECD Health Working Papers, No. 96; 2017.
    1. Panagioti M, Khan K, Keers RN, Abuzour A, Phipps D, Kontopantelis E. et al.. Prevalence, severity, and nature of preventable patient harm across medical care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2019;366:I4185. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4185 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wu AW. Medical error: the second victim: the doctor who makes the mistake needs help too. BMJ. 2000;320:726–7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.726 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rafter N, Hickey A, Conroy RM, Condell S, O’Connor P, Vaughan D. et al.. The Irish National Adverse Events Study (INAES): the frequency and nature of adverse events in Irish hospitals—a retrospective record review study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017;26:111–9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004828 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Connolly W, Rafter N, Conroy RM, Stuart C, Hickey A, Williams DJ. The Irish National Adverse Event Study-2 (INAES-2): longitudinal trends in adverse event rates in the Irish healthcare system. BMJ Qual Saf. 2021;bmjqs-2020-011122. Epub 2021 Jan 12. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011122 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types