What Makes Artificial Intelligence Exceptional in Health Technology Assessment?
- PMID: 34796318
- PMCID: PMC8594317
- DOI: 10.3389/frai.2021.736697
What Makes Artificial Intelligence Exceptional in Health Technology Assessment?
Abstract
The application of artificial intelligence (AI) may revolutionize the healthcare system, leading to enhance efficiency by automatizing routine tasks and decreasing health-related costs, broadening access to healthcare delivery, targeting more precisely patient needs, and assisting clinicians in their decision-making. For these benefits to materialize, governments and health authorities must regulate AI, and conduct appropriate health technology assessment (HTA). Many authors have highlighted that AI health technologies (AIHT) challenge traditional evaluation and regulatory processes. To inform and support HTA organizations and regulators in adapting their processes to AIHTs, we conducted a systematic review of the literature on the challenges posed by AIHTs in HTA and health regulation. Our research question was: What makes artificial intelligence exceptional in HTA? The current body of literature appears to portray AIHTs as being exceptional to HTA. This exceptionalism is expressed along 5 dimensions: 1) AIHT's distinctive features; 2) their systemic impacts on health care and the health sector; 3) the increased expectations towards AI in health; 4) the new ethical, social and legal challenges that arise from deploying AI in the health sector; and 5) the new evaluative constraints that AI poses to HTA. Thus, AIHTs are perceived as exceptional because of their technological characteristics and potential impacts on society at large. As AI implementation by governments and health organizations carries risks of generating new, and amplifying existing, challenges, there are strong arguments for taking into consideration the exceptional aspects of AIHTs, especially as their impacts on the healthcare system will be far greater than that of drugs and medical devices. As AIHTs begin to be increasingly introduced into the health care sector, there is a window of opportunity for HTA agencies and scholars to consider AIHTs' exceptionalism and to work towards only deploying clinically, economically, socially acceptable AIHTs in the health care system.
Keywords: artificial intelligence; ethical; exceptionalism; health regulation; health technology assessment; social and legal implications.
Copyright © 2021 Bélisle-Pipon, Couture, Roy, Ganache, Goetghebeur and Cohen.
Conflict of interest statement
IGC serves as a bioethics consultant for Otsuka on their Abilify MyCite product, is a member of the Illumina ethics advisory Board, and serves as an ethics consultant for Dawnlight. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Abràmoff M. D., Tobey D., Char D. S. (2020). Lessons Learned about Autonomous AI: Finding a Safe, Efficacious, and Ethical Path through the Development Process American Journal of Ophthalmology, 214. Iowa City, IA, United StatesDallas, TX, United: Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of IowaAbramoff) IDx Technologies, Coralville, IA, United States(Tobey) DLA PiperStates(Char) Division of Pediatric Cardiac Anesthes), 134–142. 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.02.022 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ahmad O. F., Stoyanov D., Lovat L. B. (2020). Barriers and Pitfalls for Artificial Intelligence in Gastroenterology: Ethical and Regulatory Issues. Tech. Innov. Gastrointest. Endosc. 22 (2), 80–84. 10.1016/j.tgie.2019.150636 - DOI
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials