Patient acceptance: Metrics, meaning, and the "missing piece" in evaluating novel devices
- PMID: 34796998
- DOI: 10.1111/jce.15292
Patient acceptance: Metrics, meaning, and the "missing piece" in evaluating novel devices
Keywords: S-ICD; device acceptance; psychological adjustment; quality of life.
Comment on
-
Patient acceptance of subcutaneous versus transvenous defibrillator systems: A multi-center experience.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 Jan;33(1):81-89. doi: 10.1111/jce.15297. Epub 2021 Nov 28. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022. PMID: 34797012
References
REFERENCES
-
- Vincentini A, Bisignani G, De Vivo S, et al. (2021). Patient acceptance of subcutaneous versus transvenous defibrillator systems: a multi-center experience. J of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. In press.
-
- Rordorf R, Casula M, Pezza L, et al. Subcutaneous versus transvenous implantable defibrillator: an updated meta-analysis. Heart Rhythm. 2021;18(3):382-391. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.11.013
-
- Karimianpour A, John L, Gold MR. The subcutaneous ICD: A review of the UNTOUCHED and PRAETORIAN Trials. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2021;10(2):108-112. doi:10.15420/aer.2020.47
-
- Gold MR, Lambiase PD, El-Chami MF, et al. Primary results from the understanding outcomes with the S-ICD in primary prevention patients with low ejection fraction (UNTOUCHED) trial. Circulation. 2021;143(1):7-17. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.048728
-
- Dornelas EA, Sears SF. Living with heart despite recurrent challenges: psychological care for adults with advanced cardiac disease. Am Psychol. 2018;73(8):1007-1018. doi:10.1037/amp0000318
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical