Added Value of Quantitative Analysis of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- PMID: 34797013
- DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28003
Added Value of Quantitative Analysis of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Abstract
Background: The ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system-magnetic resonance imaging (O-RADS-MRI) score decreases the incidence of indeterminate adnexal masses from 18% to 31% with ultrasound till 10.8% to 12.5% with MRI. Further improvement of this score may be useful to improve patients' management.
Purpose: To evaluate the added value of quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the diagnosis of adnexal masses classified according to the O-RADS-MRI score.
Study type: Prospective cohort study with retrospective DWI analysis.
Population: Among 402 recruited patients, surgery was done only in 163 women (median-age: 51 years) with 201 indeterminate adnexal masses, which were included in the final analysis.
Field strength/sequence: Standardized MRI (1.5 and 3-T) including diffusion and dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences (diffusion-weighted single-shot spin-echo echo-planar imaging) were used.
Assessment: Two radiologists classified the adnexal masses according to O-RADS-MRI and they were blinded to the pathology report. Two methods of quantitative analysis were applied using region-of-interest apparent-diffusion-coefficient (ROI-ADC) and whole-lesion ADC-histogram (WL-ADC).
Statistical tests: Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney-U tests were used to compare variables among malignant and benign lesions. Receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to examine the sensitivity/specificity of each parameter. ROI-ADC and WL-ADC of lesions with O-RADS-MRI score-4 were plotted to identify thresholds of malignant lesions. The improvement of the O-RADS-MRI score after adding these thresholds was assessed by two ROC-curves. A P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Results: Fifty-eight of the 201 lesions (28.9%) were malignant. The ROI-ADC and the WL-ADC means of malignant lesions were significantly lower than those of benign lesions. Forty-two lesions (20.9%) had an O-RADS-MRI score-4. In this subgroup, 76% of lesions with ROI-ADC < 1.7 × 10-3 mm2 /sec and WL-ADC < 2.6 × 10-3 mm2 /sec were malignant, whereas only 11.8% with ROI-ADC ≥ 1.7 × 10-3 mm2 /sec or a WL-ADC ≥ 2.6 × 10-3 mm2 /sec were malignant. The overall performance of the O-RADS-MRI score combined with these thresholds was improved.
Data conclusion: Integrating ADC-thresholds in O-RADS-MRI score-4 may discriminate low-to-intermediate and intermediate-to-high malignancy risk groups.
Level of evidence: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.
Keywords: adnexal diseases; apparent diffusion coefficient; diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; image interpretation; whole-lesion segmentation.
© 2021 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Comment in
-
Editorial for "Added-Value of Quantitative Analysis of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Magnetic Resonance Imaging (O-RADS MRI): A Prospective Cohort Study".J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022 Jul;56(1):171-172. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28011. Epub 2021 Dec 6. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022. PMID: 34866277 No abstract available.
References
-
- Callahan T, Caughey A. Blueprints obstetrics and gynecology. 7th ed. Pennsylvania: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Philadelphia; 2018 1312p.
-
- Bentivegna E, Gouy S, Maulard A, et al. Fertility-sparing surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer: A systematic review of oncological issues. Ann Oncol 2016;27(11):1994-2004.
-
- Johansen G, Dahm-Kähler P, Staf C, Flöter Rådestad A, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA. A Swedish Nationwide prospective study of oncological and reproductive outcome following fertility-sparing surgery for treatment of early stage epithelial ovarian cancer in young women. BMC Cancer 2020;20(1):1009.
-
- Timmerman D, Van Calster B, Testa A, et al. Predicting the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses based on the simple rules from the international ovarian tumor analysis group. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;214:424-437.
-
- Meys EM, Kaijser J, Kruitwagen RF, et al. Subjective assessment versus ultrasound models to diagnose ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer 2016;58:17-29.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
