Do sex differences in construction behavior relate to differences in physical cognitive abilities?
- PMID: 34797462
- DOI: 10.1007/s10071-021-01577-2
Do sex differences in construction behavior relate to differences in physical cognitive abilities?
Abstract
Nest-building behaviour in birds may be particularly relevant to investigating the evolution of physical cognition, as nest building engages cognitive mechanisms for the use and manipulation of materials. We hypothesized that nest-building ecology may be related to physical cognitive abilities. To test our hypothesis, we used zebra finches, which have sex-differentiated roles in nest building. We tested 16 male and 16 female zebra finches on three discrimination tasks in the following order: length discrimination, flexibility discrimination, and color discrimination, using different types of string. We predicted that male zebra finches, which select and deposit the majority of nesting material and are the primary nest builders in this species, would learn to discriminate string length and flexibility-structural traits relevant to nest building-in fewer trials compared to females, but that the sexes would learn color discrimination (not structurally relevant to nest building) in a similar number of trials. Contrary to these predictions, male and female zebra finches did not differ in their speed to learn any of the three tasks. There was, however, consistent among-individual variation in performance: learning speed was positively correlated across the tasks. Our findings suggest that male and female zebra finches either (1) do not differ in their physical cognitive abilities, or (2) any cognitive sex differences in zebra finches are more specific to tasks more closely associated with nest building. Our experiment is the first to examine the potential evolutionary relationship between nest building and physical cognitive abilities.
Keywords: Cognitive evolution; Comparative cognition; Estrildid finches; Experimental psychology; Individual differences; Intraspecific variation; Physical intelligence; Songbirds.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Among-individual differences in auditory and physical cognitive abilities in zebra finches.Learn Behav. 2022 Sep;50(3):389-404. doi: 10.3758/s13420-022-00520-w. Epub 2022 May 18. Learn Behav. 2022. PMID: 35583601 Free PMC article.
-
Physical cognition: birds learn the structural efficacy of nest material.Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Apr 16;281(1784):20133225. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.3225. Print 2014 Jun 7. Proc Biol Sci. 2014. PMID: 24741011 Free PMC article.
-
Social learning in nest-building birds: a role for familiarity.Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Mar 30;283(1827):20152685. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2685. Proc Biol Sci. 2016. PMID: 27009230 Free PMC article.
-
Nest building and circulating testosterone dynamics in male zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata.Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2025 Jun;369:114753. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2025.114753. Epub 2025 May 22. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2025. PMID: 40412667 Review.
-
From neurons to nests: nest-building behaviour as a model in behavioural and comparative neuroscience.J Ornithol. 2015;156(Suppl 1):133-143. doi: 10.1007/s10336-015-1214-5. Epub 2015 Apr 12. J Ornithol. 2015. PMID: 27570726 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Zebra finches have style: Nest morphology is repeatable and associated with experience.iScience. 2023 Oct 12;26(11):108194. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108194. eCollection 2023 Nov 17. iScience. 2023. PMID: 37965145 Free PMC article.
-
What do zebra finches learn besides singing? Systematic mapping of the literature and presentation of an efficient associative learning test.Anim Cogn. 2023 Sep;26(5):1489-1503. doi: 10.1007/s10071-023-01795-w. Epub 2023 Jun 10. Anim Cogn. 2023. PMID: 37300600 Free PMC article.
-
Among-individual differences in auditory and physical cognitive abilities in zebra finches.Learn Behav. 2022 Sep;50(3):389-404. doi: 10.3758/s13420-022-00520-w. Epub 2022 May 18. Learn Behav. 2022. PMID: 35583601 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Alabrudzińska J, Kaliński A, Słomczyński R et al (2003) Effects of nest characteristics on breeding success of Great Tits Parus major. Acta Ornithol 38:151–154. https://doi.org/10.3161/068.038.0202 - DOI
-
- Álvarez E, Belda EJ, Verdejo J, Barba E (2013) Variation in Great Tit nest mass and composition and its breeding consequences: a comparative study in four Mediterranean habitats. Avian Biol Res 6:39–46. https://doi.org/10.3184/175815513X13609517587237 - DOI
-
- Auersperg AMI, Huber L, Gajdon GK (2011) Navigating a tool end in a specific direction: Stick-tool use in kea (Nestor notabilis). Biol Lett 7:825–828. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2011.0388 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Auersperg AMI, Szabo B, Von Bayern AMP, Kacelnik A (2012) Spontaneous innovation in tool manufacture and use in a Goffin’s cockatoo. Curr Biol 22:R903–R904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.09.002 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Auersperg A, Teschke I, Tebbich S (2017) Physical cognition and tool use in birds. In: Avian cognition, pp 163–183
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources