Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2022 Feb;35(1):338-340.
doi: 10.1002/jts.22764. Epub 2021 Nov 19.

Natural recovery from posttraumatic stress in injured military service members: A commentary on Soumoff et al. (2021)

Affiliations
Comment

Natural recovery from posttraumatic stress in injured military service members: A commentary on Soumoff et al. (2021)

Alan L Peterson. J Trauma Stress. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Soumoff et al. (2021) reported on a sample of 2,217 injured military service members and found that somatic symptom severity was more predictive of the development of probable posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms than injury severity. PTSD has been described as one of the invisible wounds of war, suggesting that many military service members with PTSD may suffer in silence because some symptoms-such as psychological and somatic symptoms-are often not observable by others. In contrast, friends, family, fellow service members, and health care providers often ask military service members with visible, physical wounds what happened, prompting a discussion of their injury and the events that contributed to it. I posit that the findings reported by Soumoff et al. may be an example of the differences that can occur in the course of natural recovery in military service members suffering from visible versus invisible wounds of war and further hypothesize that the repeated conversations that often occur after physical injuries in military service members may foster natural recovery from the co-occurring invisible, psychological wounds of war.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Comment on

References

REFERENCES

    1. Belsher, B. E., Ruzek, J. I., Bongar, B., & Cordova, M. J. (2012). Social constraints, posttraumatic cognitions, and posttraumatic stress disorder in treatment-seeking trauma survivors: Evidence for a social-cognitive processing model. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 4(4), 386-391. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024362
    1. Burton, M. S., Cooper, A. A., Feeny, N. C., & Zoellner, L. A. (2015). The enhancement of natural resilience in trauma interventions. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 45(4), 193-204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-015-9302-7
    1. Dworkin, E. R., Brill, C. D., & Ullman, S. E. (2019). Social reactions to disclosure of interpersonal violence and psychopathology: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 72, 101750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101750
    1. Feeny, N. C., & Zoellner, L. A. (2014). Conclusion: Risk and resilience following trauma exposure. In (L. A. Zoellner & N. C. Feeny Eds.), Facilitating resilience and recovery following trauma (pp. 325-334). Guilford Press.
    1. Grieger, T. A., Cozza, S. J., Ursano, R. J., Hoge, C., Martinez, P. E., Engel, C. C., & Wain, H. J. (2006). Posttraumatic stress disorder and depression in battle-injured soldiers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163(10), 1777-1783. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.2006.163.10.1777

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources