Long-Term Trajectory of Recovery Following Pilon Fracture Fixation
- PMID: 34799544
- DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002312
Long-Term Trajectory of Recovery Following Pilon Fracture Fixation
Abstract
Objectives: To describe the trajectory of recovery following fixation of pilon fractures from baseline to 5-year follow-up.
Design: Prospective cohort study.
Setting: Level-1 trauma center.
Patients/participants: Patients with pilon fractures (OTA/AO 43.C) treated with open reduction and internal fixation.
Intervention: None.
Main outcomes measures: Patient-reported outcome measures were measured at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years using the Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Score and Mental Component Score, Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment, and the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score.
Results: One hundred two patients were enrolled: mean age was 42.6 years; 69% were males; 88% had an injury severity score of 9; 74 patients (73%) completed 1-year follow-up; 40 patients (39%) completed 5-year follow-up. Trajectory of recovery of physical function showed a significant decline between baseline and 6 months, with significant improvement between 6 months and 1 year and then ongoing but slower improvement between 1 year and 5 years. Sixty-four patients returned to baseline SF-36 Physical Component Score at 5 years. Pain was a persistent issue and remained significantly worse at 5 years when compared with baseline. Psychological well-being (SF-36 Mental Component Score) did not significantly change from baseline at 5 years.
Conclusion: Functional recovery following open reduction and internal fixation for pilon fractures was characterized by an initial decrease in function from baseline, followed by an increase between 6 months and 1 year, and then slower but continued increases from 1 year to 5 years. Function did not return to baseline levels, pain was a persistent issue, and mental well-being showed no change from baseline at 5 years. This information may be useful when counselling patients.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Pollak AN, McCarthy ML, Bess RS, et al. Outcomes after treatment of high-energy tibial plafond fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:1893–1900.
-
- White TO, Guy P, Cooke CJ, et al. The results of early primary open reduction and internal fixation for treatment of OTA 43.C-type tibial pilon fractures: a cohort study. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24:757–763.
-
- Sirkin M, Sanders R, DiPasquale T, et al. A staged protocol for soft tissue management in the treatment of complex pilon fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1999;13:78–84.
-
- Unno F, Lefaivre KA, Osterhoff G, et al. Is early definitive fixation of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures safe? An observational cohort study. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31:151–157.
-
- Ramoutar DN, Lefaivre K, Broekhuyse H, et al. Mapping recovery in simple and complex tibial plateau fracture fixation. Bone Joint J. 2019;101-B:1009–1014.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials