Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan;13(2):182-189.
doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.14237. Epub 2021 Nov 20.

Improved survival in patients with unresectable stage III EGFR-mutant adenocarcinoma with upfront EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Affiliations

Improved survival in patients with unresectable stage III EGFR-mutant adenocarcinoma with upfront EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Sheng-Yuan Wang et al. Thorac Cancer. 2022 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Although epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) have been the standard treatment for advanced EGFR-mutant adenocarcinoma, the effects of upfront EGFR-TKI use in unresectable stage III EGFR-mutant adenocarcinoma remain unexplored. Here, we conducted a retrospective study to compare different treatment strategies in these patients.

Methods: From October 2010 to June 2019, patients with unresectable stage III adenocarcinoma who received treatment at a tertiary referral center were enrolled. Patients were classified into three groups: EGFR-mutant adenocarcinoma treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (group 1) or EGFR-TKI (group 2) and EGFR wild-type adenocarcinoma treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (group 3). Progression-free survival, progression-free survival-2, and overall survival were estimated and compared using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests.

Results: A total of 92 patients were enrolled; 10, 40, and 42 patients were assigned to groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Patients with EGFR mutations who received upfront EGFR-TKIs had significantly longer progression-free and overall survival than those who received upfront concurrent chemoradiotherapy (hazard ratio 0.33 vs. 0.34, p = 0.006 vs. 0.031) according to a Cox model adjusted for possible confounders. Moreover, upfront concurrent chemoradiotherapy did not lead to higher survival rates in patients with EGFR mutations than in those with EGFR wild-type adenocarcinoma (progression-free survival; hazard ratio 0.37, p = 0.036; overall survival; hazard ratio 0.35, p = 0.080) by Cox regression analysis.

Conclusion: This current study suggests that EGFR-TKIs is a better choice for patients with unresectable stage III EGFR-mutant adenocarcinoma. However, further randomized studies are required to validate the results.

Keywords: adenocarcinoma; chemoradiotherapy; epidermal growth factor receptor; stage III; tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Study flowchart
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
(a) PFS, (b) PFS2, and (c) OS among patients with EGFR‐mutant adenocarcinoma receiving CCRT (Group 1) or upfront EGFR‐TKI (Group 2), and patients with EGFR wild‐type adenocarcinoma receiving CCRT (Group 3). CCRT, concurrent chemoradiotherapy; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; PFS, progression‐free survival; OS, overall survival; EGFR‐TKI, epidermal growth factor receptor‐tyrosine kinase inhibitor; PFS2, progression‐free survival‐2

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wang BY, Huang JY, Cheng CY, Lin CH, Ko J, Liaw YP. Lung cancer and prognosis in Taiwan: a population‐based cancer registry. J Thorac Oncol. 2013;8:1128–35. - PubMed
    1. Aupérin A, Le Péchoux C, Rolland E, Curran WJ, Furuse K, Fournel P, et al. Meta‐analysis of concomitant versus sequential radiochemotherapy in locally advanced non‐small‐cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2181–90. - PubMed
    1. Aredo JV, Mambetsariev I, Hellyer JA, Amini A, Neal JW, Padda SK, et al. Durvalumab for stage III EGFR‐mutated NSCLC after definitive chemoradiotherapy. J Thorac Oncol. 2021;16:1030–41. - PubMed
    1. Lee CK, Davies L, Wu YL, Mitsudomi T, Inoue A, Rosell R, et al. Gefitinib or erlotinib vs chemotherapy for EGFR mutation‐positive lung cancer: individual patient data meta‐analysis of overall survival. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017;109:djw279. 10.1093/jnci/djw279 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yang JC, Wu YL, Schuler M, Sebastian M, Popat S, Yamamoto N, et al. Afatinib versus cisplatin‐based chemotherapy for EGFR mutation‐positive lung adenocarcinoma (LUX‐Lung 3 and LUX‐Lung 6): analysis of overall survival data from two randomised, phase 3 trials. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:141–51. - PubMed

Publication types