Structured CT reporting of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: impact on completeness of information and interdisciplinary communication for surgical planning
- PMID: 34800162
- DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03353-9
Structured CT reporting of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: impact on completeness of information and interdisciplinary communication for surgical planning
Abstract
Purpose: With the rise in popularity of structured reports in radiology, we sought to evaluate whether free-text CT reports on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) staging at our institute met published guidelines and assess feedback of pancreatic surgeons comparing free-text and structured report styles with the same information content.
Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 298 free-text preoperative CT reports from 2015 to 2017 for the inclusion of key tumor descriptors. Two surgeons independently evaluated 50 free-text reports followed by evaluation of the same reports in a structured format using a 7-question survey to assess the usefulness and ease of information extraction. Fisher's exact test and Chi-square test for independence were utilized for categorical responses and an independent samples t test for comparing mean ratings of report quality as rated on a 5-point Likert scale.
Results: The most commonly included descriptors in free-text reports were tumor location (99%), liver lesions (97%), and suspicious lymph nodes (97%). The most commonly excluded descriptors were variant arterial anatomy and peritoneal/omental nodularity, which were present in only 23% and 42% of the reports, respectively. For vascular involvement, a mention of the presence or absence of perivascular disease with the main portal vein was most commonly included (87%). Both surgeons' rating of overall report quality was significantly higher for structured reports (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Our results indicate that free-text reports may not include key descriptors for staging PDAC. Surgeons rated structured reports that presented the same information as free-text reports but in a template format superior for guiding clinical management, convenience of use, and overall report quality.
Keywords: CT; Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; Radiology report; Report quality; Structured reporting.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Hidalgo M. Pancreatic Cancer. Lancet. 2011;378(9791):1605–1617. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673610623070?via%... .
-
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(1):7-33. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21654 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Smith SL, Rajan PS. Imaging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with emphasis on multidetector CT. Clin Radiol. 2004;59(1):26-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2003.07.002 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lee ES, Lee JM. Imaging diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: A state-of-the-art review. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(24):7864-7877. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i24.7864 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Tamm EP, Balachandran A, Bhosale PR, et al. Imaging of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Update on Staging/Resectability. Radiol Clin North Am. 2012;50(3):407-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2012.03.008 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous