Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022:161:1-51.
doi: 10.1016/bs.irn.2021.06.011. Epub 2021 Aug 20.

Peri-adolescent exposure to (meth)amphetamine in animal models

Affiliations
Review

Peri-adolescent exposure to (meth)amphetamine in animal models

T J Phillips et al. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2022.

Abstract

Experimentation with psychoactive drugs is often initiated in the peri-adolescent period, but knowledge of differences in the outcomes of peri-adolescent- vs adult-initiated exposure is incomplete. We consider the existing animal research in this area for (meth)amphetamines. Established for a number of phenotypes, is lower sensitivity of peri-adolescents than adults to acute effects of (meth)amphetamines, including neurotoxic effects of binge-level exposure. More variable are data for long-term consequences of peri-adolescent exposure on motivational and cognitive traits. Moreover, investigations often exclude an adult-initiated exposure group critical for answering questions about outcomes unique to peri-adolescent initiation. Despite this, it is clear from the animal research that (meth)amphetamine exposure during the peri-adolescent period, whether self- or other-administered, impacts brain motivational circuitry and cognitive function, and alters adult sensitivity to other drugs and natural rewards. Such consequences occurring in humans have the potential to predispose toward unfortunate and potentially disastrous family, social and livelihood outcomes.

Keywords: Addiction; Amphetamine; Cognition; Methamphetamine; Motivation; Neurotoxicity; Reward; Social behavior.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adriani W, & Laviola G (2000). A unique hormonal and behavioral hyporesponsivity to both forced novelty and d-amphetamine in periadolescent mice. Neuropharmacology, 39, 334–346. - PubMed
    1. Akindipe T, Wilson D, & Stein DJ (2014). Psychiatric disorders in individuals with methamphetamine dependence: Prevalence and risk factors. Metabolic Brain Disorders, 29, 351–357. - PubMed
    1. Anker JJ, Baron TR, Zlebnik NE, & Carroll ME (2012). Escalation of methamphetamine self-administration in adolescent and adult rats. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 124, 149–153. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baker A, & Dawe S (2005). Amphetamine use and co-occurring psychological problems: Review of the literature and implications for treatment. Australian Psychologist, 40, 88–95.
    1. Baker EP, Magnuson EC, Dahly AM, & Siegel JA (2018). The effects of enriched environment on the behavioral and corticosterone response to methamphetamine in adolescent and adult mice. Developmental Psychobiology, 60, 664–673. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances