Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Mar;110(3):285-293.
doi: 10.1007/s00223-021-00927-z. Epub 2021 Nov 21.

Suture Cells in a Mechanical Stretching Niche: Critical Contributors to Trans-sutural Distraction Osteogenesis

Affiliations
Review

Suture Cells in a Mechanical Stretching Niche: Critical Contributors to Trans-sutural Distraction Osteogenesis

Wei Liang et al. Calcif Tissue Int. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Trans-sutural distraction osteogenesis has been proposed as an alternative technique of craniofacial remodelling surgery for craniosynostosis correction. Many studies have defined the contribution of a series of biological events to distraction osteogenesis, such as changes in gene expression, changes in suture cell behaviour and changes in suture collagen fibre characteristics. However, few studies have elucidated the systematic molecular and cellular mechanisms of trans-sutural distraction osteogenesis, and no study has highlighted the contribution of cell-cell or cell-matrix interactions with respect to the whole expansion process to date. Therefore, it is difficult to translate largely primary mechanistic insights into clinical applications and optimize the clinical outcome of trans-sutural distraction osteogenesis. In this review, we carefully summarize in detail the literature related to the effects of mechanical stretching on osteoblasts, endothelial cells, fibroblasts, immune cells (macrophages and T cells), mesenchymal stem cells and collagen fibres in sutures during the distraction osteogenesis process. We also briefly review the contribution of cell-cell or cell-matrix interactions to bone regeneration at the osteogenic suture front from a comprehensive viewpoint.

Keywords: Bone formation; Mechanical stretching; Sutural cells; Trans-sutural distraction osteogenesis; Vascularization.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Tong H et al (2015) Trans-sutural distraction osteogenesis for midfacial hypoplasia in growing patients with cleft lip and palate: clinical outcomes and analysis of skeletal changes. Plast Reconstr Surg 136:144–155. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001375 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Robin NH (1999) Molecular genetic advances in understanding craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 103:1060–1070 - DOI
    1. Ten Cate AR, Freeman E, Dickinson JB (1977) Sutural development: structure and its response to rapid expansion. Am J Orthod 71:622–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(77)90279-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liang W et al (2021) Hydroxyapatite nanoparticles facilitate osteoblast differentiation and bone formation within sagittal suture during expansion in rats. Drug Des Devel Ther 15:905–917. https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S299641 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Ekström C, Henrikson CO, Jensen R (1977) Mineralization in the midpalatal suture after orthodontic expansion. Am J Orthod 71:449–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(77)90248-2 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources