Efficiency and safety of laser-assisted hatching on vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles: a prospective control trial
- PMID: 34802083
- DOI: 10.1007/s10103-021-03453-4
Efficiency and safety of laser-assisted hatching on vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles: a prospective control trial
Abstract
To clarify the efficiency and safety of laser-assisted hatching (LAH) application on vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (VBT) cycles, we designed the non-randomized concurrent control trial included 4039 VBT cycles in the Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, during the even days from November 2014 to December 2015. The VBT cycles were divided into LAH group (n = 1932) and non-LAH group (n = 2107) according to the date of blastocyst thawing. Laser-partial zona pellucida dissection was performed on all blastocysts thawed on that day every 4 days, and those blastocysts were assigned to the LAH group. There were a higher biochemical pregnancy rate (66.87% vs 63.69%; P = 0.034; rate ratio for LAH vs non-LAH group [RR], 1.050; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.004-1.098) and an increased live birth rate (48.81% vs 45.51%; P = 0.036; RR, 1.072; 95% CI, 1.005-1.145) with comparable ectopic pregnancy, twin or multiple pregnancies, spontaneous abortion and birth defect rates of the LAH group than those of the non-LAH group. Subgroup analysis showed that live birth rate, birth defect rate, and other pregnancy outcomes were comparable for patients younger than 35 years when blastocyst transfer, patients with endometrium thickness less than 0.9 cm during ovulation or the initiation of progesterone treatment, ICSI blastocysts, AC or BC blastocysts according to Gardner morphological criteria and day 5 blastocysts of the LAH group than it of non-LAH group. LAH could be performed selectively on vitrified-warmed blastocysts before transfer for better pregnancy outcomes. Trial registration number: ChiCTR2000032975. Date of registration: May 17, 2020. Retrospectively registered.
Keywords: Birth defect rate; Laser-assisted hatching; Live birth rate; Subgroup analysis; Vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
The effect of laser-assisted hatching on vitrified/warmed blastocysts: the ALADDIN randomized controlled trial.Fertil Steril. 2024 Jul;122(1):106-113. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.02.010. Epub 2024 Feb 9. Fertil Steril. 2024. PMID: 38342371 Clinical Trial.
-
ALADDIN study: does assisted hatching of vitrified/warmed blastocysts improve live birth rate? Protocol for a multicentric randomised controlled trial.BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 19;10(7):e031544. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031544. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32690492 Free PMC article.
-
Laser-assisted hatching improves pregnancy outcomes in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles of cleavage-stage embryos: a large retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Feb;40(2):417-427. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02711-w. Epub 2023 Jan 7. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023. PMID: 36609944 Free PMC article.
-
Two laser-assisted hatching methods of embryos in ART: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Apr 22;24(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06380-8. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024. PMID: 38649878 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of laser-assisted hatching on pregnancy outcomes of cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Lasers Med Sci. 2018 Apr;33(3):655-666. doi: 10.1007/s10103-017-2372-x. Epub 2017 Nov 7. Lasers Med Sci. 2018. PMID: 29116610 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical and neonatal outcomes of complete zona pellucida removal by laser-assisted hatching after single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer.Lasers Med Sci. 2024 Jan 29;39(1):51. doi: 10.1007/s10103-024-04002-5. Lasers Med Sci. 2024. PMID: 38285329
-
Calcium ionophore improves embryonic development and pregnancy outcomes in patients with previous developmental problems in ICSI cycles.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Dec 2;22(1):894. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05228-3. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022. PMID: 36460987 Free PMC article.
-
Congenital anomalies observed in children conceived through assisted reproductive technology-a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 May;42(5):1547-1565. doi: 10.1007/s10815-025-03454-0. Epub 2025 Mar 31. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025. PMID: 40163274 Free PMC article.
-
Laser-assisted hatching is associated with reduced re-expansion of vitrified-thawed blastocysts and has no significant effect on embryo implantation.J Ovarian Res. 2025 Jun 21;18(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s13048-025-01723-1. J Ovarian Res. 2025. PMID: 40544282 Free PMC article.
-
Live birth from a blastocyst derived from a conjoined oocyte in a frozen embryo transfer cycle: a case report and a literature review.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022 Jun;39(6):1351-1357. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02465-5. Epub 2022 Mar 23. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022. PMID: 35320445 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Viganò P, Alteri A, Busnelli A, Vanni V, Somigliana E (2020) Frozen IVF cycles to circumvent the hormonal storm on endometrium. Trends Endocrinol Metab 31(4):296–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2020.01.009 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Chen Z, Shi Y, Sun Y, Zhang B, Liang X, Cao Y, Yang J, Liu J, Wei D, Weng N et al (2016) Fresh versus frozen embryos for infertility in the polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med 375(6):523–533. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1513873 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Shi Y, Sun Y, Hao C, Zhang H, Wei D, Zhang Y, Zhu Y, Deng X, Qi X, Li H et al (2018) Transfer of fresh versus frozen embryos in ovulatory women. N Engl J Med 378(2):126–136. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1705334 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Stormlund S, Sopa N, Zedeler A, Bogstad J, Prætorius L, Nielsen H, Kitlinski M, Skouby S, Mikkelsen A, Spangmose A et al (2020) Freeze-all versus fresh blastocyst transfer strategy during in vitro fertilisation in women with regular menstrual cycles: multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 370:m2519. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m2519 - DOI
-
- Cohen J, Elsner C, Kort H, Malter H, Massey J, Mayer M, Wiemer K (1990) Impairment of the hatching process following IVF in the human and improvement of implantation by assisting hatching using micromanipulation. Hum Reprod (Oxford, England) 5(1):7–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137044 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- 81401266/national natural science foundation of china
- 2017YFC1001504/national key research and development program of china
- 2018YFC1004000/national key research and development program of china
- ZR2013HQ053/natural science foundation of shandong province
- JQ201816/foundation for distinguished young scholars of shandong province
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources