Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Jan;31(1):197-204.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-07056-z. Epub 2021 Nov 20.

Efficacy of erector spinae plane block on postoperative pain in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Efficacy of erector spinae plane block on postoperative pain in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery

Sinan Asar et al. Eur Spine J. 2022 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Major lumbar spine surgery causes severe pain in the postoperative period. There are few studies regarding the effect of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) effect on lumbar surgery and its effect is still controversial. Therefore, the study aimed to investigate the effect of ultrasound-guided low thoracic ESPB on opioid consumption and postoperative pain score.

Material and methods: Seventy-eight patients undergoing elective open lumbar spine surgery were randomized into two groups. In ESPB group (n = 35) received ultrasound-guided ESPB and in the control group (n = 35), there was no block. Postoperative opioid consumption as morphine equivalent dose, numerical rating scale, mobilization time, discharge time and side effects, bolus deliveries, rescue analgesia doses were evaluated.

Results: Total opioid consumption as morphine equivalent was higher in the control group than the ESPB group (p = 0.000). Compare with the control group, the numeric rating scale scores were lower in the ESPB group at the 6th, 12th, and 24th hours (p < 0.05). The patient-controlled analgesia button pressing number in the postoperative 24-h period was lower in the ESPB group (p = 0.000). In the postoperative 24-h period, the need for paracetamol in the ESPB group was lower and the difference between the groups was statistically significant (p = 0.008). Rescue analgesia (diclofenac) doses were higher in the control group (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of side effects and mobilization times.

Conclusion: ESPB is adequate for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery and can reduce opioid consumption compared with standard analgesia.

Keywords: Acute pain management; Erector spinae plane block; Lumbar spine surgery; Patient-controlled analgesia; Postoperative pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Lee BH, Park JO, Suk KS, Kim TH, Lee HM, Park MS, Lee SH, Park S, Lee JY, Ko SK, Moon SH (2013) Pre-emptive and multi-modal perioperative pain management may improve quality of life in patients undergoing spinal surgery. Pain Physician 16:E217–E226 - PubMed
    1. Derbent A, Yilmaz B, Uyar M (2012) Chronic pain following spine surgery (in Turkish). Ağrı: J Turkish Soc Algol 24:1–9
    1. Devin CJ, McGirt MJ (2015) Best evidence in multimodal pain management in spine surgery and means of assessing postoperative pain and functional outcomes. J Clin Neurosci 22:930–938 - DOI
    1. Atabey C, Zorlu E, Kurt H, Göçmen S, Ünsal D, Dinç C, Demircan MN (2016) The cheapest way of the pain management after lumbar spinal surgical procedures: cold pack application (in Turkish). Gulhane Medical Journal 58:33–36 - DOI
    1. Cohen BE, Hartman MB, Wade JT et al (1997) Postoperative pain control after lumbar spine fusion: patient-controlled analgesia versus continuous epidural analgesia. Spine 22:1892–1897 - DOI

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources