Tricuspid insufficiency after cardiac-implantable electronic device placement
- PMID: 34804393
- PMCID: PMC8604508
- DOI: 10.1080/20009666.2021.1967569
Tricuspid insufficiency after cardiac-implantable electronic device placement
Abstract
Objective: Device-related estimates of incidence and significance of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is mainly based on case reports and small observational studies. We sought to determine whether right-heart device implantation increased the risk of TR in this interventional study.
Methods: All patients who underwent permanent pacemaker (PPM) or other device implantation were assessed for degree of TR at one year. The data collected was analyzed on IBM SPSS version 26. Descriptive statistics were applied for qualitative variables. Mean and standard deviation were applied for quantitative variables. Regression analysis and paired t-tests were applied for the degree of change and predictors of TR.
Results: Out of 165 participants, 73.94% were male. The mean age of the participants was 59.86 ± 12.03 years. Dual-chamber pacemaker (DDDR) was the most common device implanted (78.18%) causing significant TR and drop in left ventricular ejection fraction as compared to other devices (p-value < 0.05). The paired t-test for changes in ejection fraction (LVEF) and TR were also significant (p-value < 0.05). A regression model predicted significant TR to depend on baseline LVEF (p-value < 0.05).
Conclusion: Device-related worsening of TR is related to mechanical mechanisms. It is significantly associated with DDDR pacemakers after a 1-year follow-up.
Keywords: Tricuspid regurgitation; ejection fraction; heart block; heart failure; implantation devices.
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group on behalf of Greater Baltimore Medical Center.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
-
- Pokorney SD, Parzynski CS, Daubert JP, et al. Temporal trends in and factors associated with use of single- versus dual-coil implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads: data from the NCDR ICD registry. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;3(6):612–619. - PubMed
-
- Carlson MD. ICD leads and postmarketing surveillance. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(10):967. - PubMed
-
- Pappalardo OA, Votta E, Selmi M, et al. 4D MDCT in the assessment of the tricuspid valve and its spatial relationship with the right coronary artery: a customized tool based on computed tomography for the planning of percutaneous procedures. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2020;14(6):520–523. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources