Using Novel Statistical Techniques to Accurately Determine the Predictive Dose Range in a Study of Overall Survival after Definitive Radiotherapy for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Association with Heart Dose
- PMID: 34804634
- PMCID: PMC8601657
- DOI: 10.4236/jct.2021.129044
Using Novel Statistical Techniques to Accurately Determine the Predictive Dose Range in a Study of Overall Survival after Definitive Radiotherapy for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Association with Heart Dose
Abstract
Purpose: Recent studies of radiotherapy (RT) for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have associated high dose to the heart with cardiac toxicity and decreased overall survival (OS). We used advanced statistical techniques to account for correlations between dosimetric variables and more accurately determine the range of heart doses which are associated with reduced OS in patients receiving RT for stage III NSCLC.
Methods: From 2006 to 2013, 119 patients with stage III NSCLC received definitive RT at our institution. OS data was obtained from institutional tumor registry. We used multivariate Cox model to determine patient specific covariates predictive for reduced overall survival. We examined age, prescription dose, mean lung dose, lung V20, RT technique, stage, chemotherapy, tumor laterality, tumor volume, and tumor site as candidate covariates. We subsequently used novel statistical techniques within multivariate Cox model to systematically search the whole heart dose-volume histogram (DVH) for dose parameters associated with OS.
Results: Patients were followed until death or 2.5 to 81.2 months (median 30.4 months) in those alive at last follow up. On multivariate analysis of whole heart DVH, the dose of 51 Gy was identified as a threshold dose above which the dose volume relationship becomes predictive for OS. We identified V55Gy (percentage of the whole heart volume receiving at least 55 Gy) as the best single DVH index which can be used to set treatment optimization constraints (Hazard Ratio = 1.044 per 1% increase in heart volume exposed to at least 55 Gy, P = 0.03). Additional characteristics correlated with OS on multivariate analysis were age, stage (IIIA/IIIB), and administration of chemotherapy.
Conclusion: Doses above 51 Gy, applied to small volumes of the heart, are associated with worse OS in stage III NSCLC patients treated with definitive RT. Higher stage, older age and lack of chemotherapy were also associated with reduced OS.
Keywords: Cardiac Toxicity; Lung Cancer; Lung Radiation Therapy; Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer; Radiation Toxicity.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest Dr. Schild reports writing and editing for UpToDate. No conflicts exist for remaining authors.
References
-
- Lancellotti P, Nkomo VT, Badano LP, Bergler-Klein J, Bogaert J, Davin L, et al. (2013) Expert Consensus for Multi-Modality Imaging Evaluation of Cardiovascular Complications of Radiotherapy in Adults: A Report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. European Heart Journal: Cardiovascular Imaging, 14, 721–740. 10.1093/ehjci/jet123 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Wang K, Eblan MJ, Deal AM, Lipner M, Zagar TM, Wang Y, et al. (2017) Cardiac Toxicity after Radiotherapy for Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Pooled Analysis of Dose-Escalation Trials Delivering 70 to 90 Gy. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 35, 1387–1394. 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.0229 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Xue J, Han C, Jackson A, Hu C, Yao H, Wang W, et al. (2019) Doses of Radiation to the Pericardium, Instead of Heart, are Significant for Survival in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Radiotherapy and Oncology: Journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 133, 213–219. 10.1016/J.radonc.2018.10.029 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Wang K, Pearlstein KA, Patchett ND, Deal AM, Mavroidis P, Jensen BC, et al. (2017) Heart Dosimetric Analysis of Three Types of Cardiac Toxicity in Patients Treated on Dose-Escalation Trials for Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Radiotherapy and Oncology, 125, 293–300. 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.10.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Grants and funding
- U10 CA035267/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- N01 CA035431/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA037404/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- N01 CA035119/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA035101/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA035113/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA035431/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA035119/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA025224/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA035090/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA035103/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA063848/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA035195/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA035415/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
- U10 CA063849/CA/NCI NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources