Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 16;13(11):e19624.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.19624. eCollection 2021 Nov.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: Are Benefits Demonstrated in International Studies Replicable in Pakistan?

Affiliations

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: Are Benefits Demonstrated in International Studies Replicable in Pakistan?

Faiza H Soomro et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Objectives To determine the efficacy of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in terms of frequency of surgical site infection (SSI) and length of hospital stay in patients undergoing colorectal surgeries for colorectal carcinoma. Study design Quasi-experimental study. Setting/Duration of study Department of Surgery, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, from May 7, 2019 to November 6, 2019. Methodology A total of 120 patients with colorectal carcinomas who fulfilled that sample selection criteria were studied. After randomization, patients were divided into two equal groups; one group received management under ERAS while the second group received conventional management. All patients were recorded for length of hospital stay and the development of SSIs. Data were analyzed using SPSS 26.0. Results The mean age was 42.34 ± 14.45 years, with a male majority, i.e., 72 (60%). The mean duration of in-patient stay was 3.45 ± 1.73 days with ERAS and 8.25 ± 1.58 days with conventional management (p < 0.001). A total of 28 (23.3%) SSIs developed, of which nine (7.5%) SSIs occurred with ERAS, while 19 (15.8%) occurred with traditional management (p = 0.031). Conclusion ERAS protocols have been demonstrated to be effective, cheap, and safe. There is a tangible reduction in length of hospital stay and incidence of SSIs which translates into reduced utilization of resources and financial costs. However, strict adherence to the protocol may be necessary to obtain the aforementioned benefits, which may be difficult to do in the face of professional, institutional, and personal inertia. Intensive efforts are required to make these protocols more convenient and attractive to implement, so as to facilitate conversion to this management approach.

Keywords: colorectal cancer; colorectal surgery; enhanced recovery after surgery; length of hospital stay; surgical site infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Consort flowsheet showing patient allocation to study groups.

References

    1. Concise update on colorectal cancer epidemiology. Mattiuzzi C, Sanchis-Gomar F, Lippi G. Ann Transl Med. 2019;7:609. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Molecular pathogenesis of sporadic colorectal cancers. Yamagishi H, Kuroda H, Imai Y, Hiraishi H. Chin J Cancer. 2016;35:4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lifestyle factors and risk of sporadic colorectal cancer by microsatellite instability status: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Carr PR, Alwers E, Bienert S, Weberpals J, Kloor M, Brenner H, Hoffmeister M. Ann Oncol. 2018;29:825–834. - PubMed
    1. Mechanical bowel preparation versus no preparation before colorectal surgery: a randomized prospective trial in a tertiary care institute. Saha AK, Chowdhury F, Jha AK, Chatterjee S, Das A, Banu P. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2014;5:421–424. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Elective bowel surgery with or without prophylactic nasogastric decompression: a prospective, randomized trial. Vinay HG, Raza M, Siddesh G. J Surg Tech Case Rep. 2015;7:37–41. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources