Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec;11(4):471-476.
doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2021.07.006. Epub 2021 Nov 3.

Profile of referrals to an intensive care unit from a regional hospital emergency centre in KwaZulu-Natal

Affiliations

Profile of referrals to an intensive care unit from a regional hospital emergency centre in KwaZulu-Natal

Mika Singh et al. Afr J Emerg Med. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: The objective was to describe the clinical characteristics, disease profile and outcome of patients referred from a regional hospital Emergency Centre (EC) to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

Methods: A retrospective review was performed using data extracted from the Integrated Critical Care Electronic Database (iCED). Data were extracted from the database with respect to patient characteristics, Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) grading, and outcome of the ICU referral. Modified early warning scores (MEWS) were calculated from EC referral data.

Results: There were a total of 2187 referrals. Of these, 56.3% (1231/2187) were male. The mean age of referrals was 36 years. Of the referred patients, 41.5% (907/2187) were initially accepted for admission. A further 378 patients were accepted for admission after a follow up ICU review. Medical conditions accounted for the majority of patient referrals, followed by general surgery and trauma. Most patients initially accepted to ICU were classified as SCCM I and II and had a mean MEWS of 4. Almost half of the patients experienced a delay in admission, most commonly due to a lack of ICU bed availability. ICU mortality was 13.6% for patients admitted from the EC.

Discussion: The EC population referred to the ICU was young with a high burden of medical and trauma conditions. Decisions to accept patients to ICU are limited by available resources, and there was a need to apply ICU triage criteria. Delays in the transfer of ICU patients from the EC increase the workload and contribute to EC crowding.

Keywords: Critical care; Decision-making; Emergency centre; Intensive care unit.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Summary of ICU decision and outcomes of referrals.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Reasons for accepted patients not being admitted to ICU.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Simpson H., Clancy M., Goldfrad C., Rowan K. Admissions to intensive care units from emergency departments: a descriptive study. Emerg Med J. 2005;22(6):423–428. doi: 10.1136/emj.2003.005124. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. O' Connor G., Geary U., Moriarty J. Critical care in the emergency deaprtment. Eur J Emerg Med. 2009;16(6):296–300. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0bo13e32831090bd. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fu K., Chen Y., Fan J., et al. Emergency department critical care unit for critically ill cardiovascular patients: an observational study. J Chin Med Assoc. 2017;80(4):233–244. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2016.09.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Herring A., Ginde A., Fahimi J. Increasing critical care admissions from U.S. Emergency Departments, 2001–2009. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(5):1197–1204. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827c086f. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adhikari N., Fowler R., Bhagwanjee S., Rubenfeld G. Critical care and the global burden of critical illness in adults. Lancet. 2010;376(9749):1339–1346. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60446-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources