Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021;9(1):52.
doi: 10.1186/s40878-021-00265-x. Epub 2021 Nov 16.

Towards a typology of social protection for migrants and refugees in Latin America during the COVID-19 pandemic

Affiliations

Towards a typology of social protection for migrants and refugees in Latin America during the COVID-19 pandemic

Marcia Vera Espinoza et al. Comp Migr Stud. 2021.

Abstract

The COVID-19 health crisis has put to the test Latin America's already precarious social protection systems. This paper comparatively examines what type of social protection has been provided, by whom, and to what extent migrant and refugee populations have been included in these programmes in seven countries of the region during the COVID-19 pandemic, between March and December 2020. We develop a typology of models of social protection highlighting the assemblages of actors, different modes of protection and the emerging migrants' subjectification in Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru, and Uruguay in relation to Non-Contributory Social Transfer (NCST) programmes and other actions undertaken by state and non-state actors. The analysis is based on 85 semi-structured interviews with representatives of national and local governments, International Organisations, Civil Society Organisations, and migrant-led organisations across 16 cities, and a systematic review of regulatory frameworks in the country-case studies. The proposed typology shows broad heterogeneity and complexity regarding different degrees of inclusion of migrant and refugee populations, particularly in pre-existing and new NCST programmes. These actions are furthering notions of migrant protection that are contingent and crisis-driven, imposing temporal limitations that often selectively exclude migrants based on legal status. It also brings to the fore the path-dependent nature of policies and practices of exclusion/inclusion in the region, which impact on migrants' effective access to social and economic rights, while shaping the broader dynamics of migration governance in the region.

Keywords: Covid-19; Exclusion; Inclusion; Latin America; Migrants; Migration governance; Migration policy; Refugees; Social protection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Acosta D. The national versus the foreigner in South America. 200 Years of migration and citizenship law. Cambridge University Press; 2018.
    1. Acosta, D., Blouin, C., & Freier, L. F. (2019). La emigración venezolana: Respuestas latinoamericanas. Fundación Carolina. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/7097487.pdf. Accessed 22 June 2020.
    1. Acuña, J. (2021). Informe No 3 OCEC: Subsidios en Pandemia. Julio 2021. Santiago: OCEC UDP. https://ocec.udp.cl/proyecto/552/.
    1. Asa P, Ceriani P. Migrantes, derechos sociales y políticas públicas en América Latina y El Caribe: La universalidad en juego. In: Arcidiácono P, Espejo Yaksic N, Rodríguez Garavito C, editors. Derechos sociales: Justicia, política y economía en América Latina. Siglo de Hombre Editores y la eHR; 2010. pp. 331–384.
    1. Avritzer L. Sociedade civil, instituições participativas e representação: Da autorização à legitimidade da ação. Dados. 2007;50(3):443–464. doi: 10.1590/S0011-52582007000300001. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources