Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Oct;10(10):4085-4098.
doi: 10.21037/tau-20-945.

Systemic treatment of penile squamous cell carcinoma-hurdles and hopes of preclinical models and clinical regimens: a narrative review

Affiliations
Review

Systemic treatment of penile squamous cell carcinoma-hurdles and hopes of preclinical models and clinical regimens: a narrative review

Anita Thomas et al. Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Despite contemporary research efforts, the prognosis of penile squamous cell carcinoma (PeSCC) has not significantly improved over the past decade. Despite frequently encountered patient-related delayed medical consultations impairing outcomes, several other aspects contribute to the lack of advancement in the treatment of this condition. One essential reason is that translational research, a prerequisite for the clinically successful disease management, is still at an early stage in PeSCC as compared to many other malignancies. Preclinical experimental models are indispensable for the evaluation of tumor biology and identification of genomic alterations. However, since neither commercial PeSCC cell lines are available nor xenograft models sustainably established, such analyses are challenging in this field of research. In addition, systemic therapies are less effective and toxic without decisive breakthroughs over recent years. Current systemic management of PeSCC is based on protocols that have been investigated in small series of only up to 30 patients. Thus, there is an unmet medical need for new approaches necessitating research efforts to develop more efficacious systemic strategies. This review aims to highlight the current state of knowledge in the molecular alterations involved in the etiology and ensuing steps for cancer progression, existing preclinical models of translational research, clinically relevant systemic protocols, and ongoing clinical trials.

Keywords: Penile squamous cell carcinoma (PeSCC); copy number alterations (CNAs); mutational profiling; treatment, biomarkers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-20-945). The series “Management of Advanced Genitourinary Malignancies” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. Dr. PES reports other from NCCN Bladder and Penile Cancer Panel, other from Global Society of Rare GU Tumors, during the conduct of the study. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of different technological approaches to study genetic and epigenetic alterations in penile cancer (A) gene dosage analysis and detection of copy number alterations, (B) mutational profiling, (C) DNA methylation changes, and (D) transcriptomic and integrated pathways analysis. Representative examples of genes involved in the development and progression of PeSCC are indicated in rectangles. PeSCC, penile squamous cell carcinoma.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Douglawi A, Masterson TA. Penile cancer epidemiology and risk factors: a contemporary review. Curr Opin Urol 2019;29:145-9. 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000581 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thomas A, Vanthoor J, Vos G, et al. Risk factors and molecular characterization of penile cancer: impact on prognosis and potential targets for systemic therapy. Curr Opin Urol 2020;30:202-7. 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000712 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Diorio GJ, Giuliano AR. The Role of Human Papilloma Virus in Penile Carcinogenesis and Preneoplastic Lesions: A Potential Target for Vaccination and Treatment Strategies. Urol Clin North Am 2016;43:419-25. 10.1016/j.ucl.2016.06.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Backes DM, Kurman RJ, Pimenta JM, et al. Systematic review of human papillomavirus prevalence in invasive penile cancer. Cancer Causes Control 2009;20:449-57. 10.1007/s10552-008-9276-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Paiva GR, de Oliveira Araujo IB, Athanazio DA, et al. Penile cancer: impact of age at diagnosis on morphology and prognosis. Int Urol Nephrol 2015;47:295-9. 10.1007/s11255-014-0875-y - DOI - PubMed