Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 3:3:730755.
doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.730755. eCollection 2021.

Economic Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions in Palliative Care: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Affiliations

Economic Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions in Palliative Care: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Panagiota Naoum et al. Front Digit Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: Digital health interventions can facilitate the provision of palliative care. However, the economic evaluation of such interventions has not yet been a standard practice. The present study aimed to identify the existing literature on the particular subject. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in six literature databases between 2010 and 2021: PubMed, Scopus, DARE, NHS EED, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Methodological quality was assessed with the Drummond Checklist. Results: The search identified 423 publications, 66 of which were removed as duplicates, resulting in 357 records to be screened by title and abstract. Ten studies were subjected to full-text review and 3 were included in the analysis. The interventions of these studies referred to video consultations and eHealth interventions for symptom management. Overall, the digital health interventions incurred lower costs compared with usual care or no intervention and were considered cost saving and cost-effective. The methodological quality of the studies was considered good. Conclusion: The results of this systematic review indicate that the use of digital health interventions has the potential to be cost-effective in palliative care. However, applicability and generalizability of the evidence is uncertain, mainly due to methodological heterogeneity and scarcity of research.

Keywords: costs and outcomes; digital health; economic evaluation; palliative care; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow chart.

References

    1. WHO . WHO Definition of Palliative Care. Available online at: https://www.who.int/health-topics/palliative-care (accessed June 6, 2021).
    1. WHO . Integrating Palliative Care And Symptom Relief Into Primary Health Care: A Who Guide for Planners, Implementers and Managers. Geneva: World Health Organization; (2018).
    1. Coelho A, Parola V, Cardoso D, Bravo ME, Apóstolo J. Use of non-pharmacological interventions for comforting patients in palliative care: a scoping review. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. (2017) 15:1867–904. 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003204 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eysenbach G. What is e-health? J Med Internet Res. (2001) 3:e20. 10.2196/jmir.3.2.e20 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO . WHO Guideline: Recommendations On Digital Interventions For Health System Strengthening. (2019). Available online at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/311941/9789241550505-en... (accessed June 24, 2021). - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources