Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec;39(4):459-465.
doi: 10.1080/02813432.2021.2004713. Epub 2021 Nov 21.

Psychosocial consequences of screening-detected abdominal aortic aneurisms: a cross-sectional study

Christina Sadolin Damhus  1   2 , Volkert Siersma  1 , Anders Hansson  3   4 , Christine Winther Bang  1 , John Brodersen  1   2
Affiliations

Psychosocial consequences of screening-detected abdominal aortic aneurisms: a cross-sectional study

Christina Sadolin Damhus et al. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: In Sweden, an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening programme was gradually implemented from 2009 to reduce the incidence of rupture and thereby mortality. AAA screening introduces a variety of unintended, but generally unavoidable, harms, e.g. stress and worry. Such psychosocial consequences have previously only been investigated with generic measures. Therefore, the aim of this study was to describe and compare the psychosocial consequences in men with a screening detected AAA to men with a normal screening result after they participated in the Swedish national AAA-screening programme using a validated psychometric instrument.

Material and methods: This study was a cross-sectional survey. Data were originally collected to validate the COS-AAA and has previously been published in details. The Consequences of Screening in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (COS-AAA) questionnaire was sent to 250 men with a screening detected AAA and 500 with a normal screening result who were randomly selected from a Swedish population-based screening register.

Results: In total, 158 (63%) men with a screening detected AAA and 275 (55%) men with a normal screening result completed the COS-AAA. We found that men with a screening detected AAA reported negative psychosocial consequences to a greater extent in 10 of 13 COS-AAA Part 1 scales, all statistically significant except three (behaviour, sleep and negative experiences from examination). For COS-AAA Part 2, there was a statistically significant difference between groups in four of five scales.

Conclusions: Men diagnosed with a screening detected AAA, reported more negative psychosocial consequences compared to men with a normal result. Screening for abdominal aorta aneurism (AAA) introduces intended benefits and unintended harms. Adequate measures are necessary to determine the balance between them.Key points:This study applied a condition-specific questionnaire with high content validity and adequate psychometric properties to measure psychosocial consequences in men participating in AAA screening.We found that men with a screening detected AAA reported more negative psychosocial consequences than men with a normal aorta size.The risk of negative psychosocial consequences is important to include in the decision making on whether to participate in screening or not.

Keywords: COS-AAA questionnaire; Screening; abdominal aortic aneurysm; psychosocial consequences; survey study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Reimerink JJ, van der Laan MJ, Koelemay MJ, et al. . Systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based mortality from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg. 2013;100(11):1405–1413. - PubMed
    1. Norman PE, Jamrozik K, Lawrence-Brown MM, et al. . Population based randomised controlled trial on impact of screening on mortality from abdominal aortic aneurysm. BMJ. 2004;329(7477):1259. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lindholt JS, Sørensen J, Søgaard R, et al. . Long-term benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms from a randomized controlled trial. Br J Surg. 2010;97(6):826–834. - PubMed
    1. Ashton HA, Buxton MJ, Day NE, Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study Group, et al.. The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;360(9345):1531–1539. - PubMed
    1. Thompson SG, Ashton HA, Gao L, Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) Group, et al.. Final follow-up of the Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) randomized trial of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening. Br J Surg. 2012;99(12):1649–1656. - PMC - PubMed