Crop phenotyping in a context of global change: What to measure and how to do it
- PMID: 34807514
- DOI: 10.1111/jipb.13191
Crop phenotyping in a context of global change: What to measure and how to do it
Abstract
High-throughput crop phenotyping, particularly under field conditions, is nowadays perceived as a key factor limiting crop genetic advance. Phenotyping not only facilitates conventional breeding, but it is necessary to fully exploit the capabilities of molecular breeding, and it can be exploited to predict breeding targets for the years ahead at the regional level through more advanced simulation models and decision support systems. In terms of phenotyping, it is necessary to determined which selection traits are relevant in each situation, and which phenotyping tools/methods are available to assess such traits. Remote sensing methodologies are currently the most popular approaches, even when lab-based analyses are still relevant in many circumstances. On top of that, data processing and automation, together with machine learning/deep learning are contributing to the wide range of applications for phenotyping. This review addresses spectral and red-green-blue sensing as the most popular remote sensing approaches, alongside stable isotope composition as an example of a lab-based tool, and root phenotyping, which represents one of the frontiers for field phenotyping. Further, we consider the two most promising forms of aerial platforms (unmanned aerial vehicle and satellites) and some of the emerging data-processing techniques. The review includes three Boxes that examine specific case studies.
Keywords: crop phenotyping; deep learning; models; photosynthesis; platforms; remote sensing; roots; satellites; sensors; stable isotopes.
© 2021 Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Aasen, H., Honkavaara, E., Lucieer, A., and Zarco-Tejada, P.J. (2018). Quantitative remote sensing at ultra-high resolution with UAV spectroscopy: A review of sensor technology, measurement procedures, and data correction workflows. Remote Sens. Ecol. Conserv. 10: 1091.
-
- Abadi, M., Barham, P., Chen, J., Chen, Z., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., Ghemawat, S., Irving, G., Isard, M., Kudlur, M., Levenberg, J., Monga, R., Moore, S., Murray, D.G., Steiner, B., Tucker, P., Vasudevan, V., Warden, P., Wicke, M., Yu, Y., and Zheng, X. (2016). TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learning. In: Abadi, M., Barham, P. eds, Proceedings of the 12th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI' 16, November 2-4, 2016 • Savannah, GA, USA, ISBN 978-1-931971-33-1). pp. 265-283.
-
- Ainsworth, E.A. (2017). Understanding and improving global crop response to ozone pollution. Plant J. 90: 886-897.
-
- Ainsworth, E.A., Serbin, S.P., Skoneczka, J.A., and Townsend, P.A. (2014). Using leaf optical properties to detect ozone effects on foliar biochemistry. Photosynth. Res. 119: 65-76.
-
- Afonso, M., Fonteijn, H., Fiorentin, F.S., Lensink, D., Mooij, M., Faber, N., Polder, G., and Wehrens, R. (2020). Tomato fruit detection and counting in greenhouses using deep learning. Front. Plant Sci. 11: 1-12.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous