Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 19;6(4):e32320.
doi: 10.2196/32320.

Differences in Secure Messaging, Self-management, and Glycemic Control Between Rural and Urban Patients: Secondary Data Analysis

Stephanie A Robinson  1   2 , Dane Netherton  1 , Mark Zocchi  1   3 , Carolyn Purington  1 , Arlene S Ash  4 , Stephanie L Shimada  4   5
Affiliations

Differences in Secure Messaging, Self-management, and Glycemic Control Between Rural and Urban Patients: Secondary Data Analysis

Stephanie A Robinson et al. JMIR Diabetes. .

Abstract

Background: Rural patients with diabetes have difficulty accessing care and are at higher risk for poor diabetes management. Sustained use of patient portal features such as secure messaging (SM) can provide accessible support for diabetes self-management.

Objective: This study explored whether rural patients' self-management and glycemic control was associated with the use of SM.

Methods: This secondary, cross-sectional, mixed methods analysis of 448 veterans with diabetes used stratified random sampling to recruit a diverse sample from the United States (rural vs urban and good vs poor glycemic control). Administrative, clinical, survey, and interview data were used to determine patients' rurality, use of SM, diabetes self-management behaviors, and glycemic control. Moderated mediation analyses assessed these relationships.

Results: The sample was 51% (n=229) rural and 49% (n=219) urban. Mean participant age was 66.4 years (SD 7.7 years). More frequent SM use was associated with better diabetes self-management (P=.007), which was associated with better glycemic control (P<.001). Among rural patients, SM use was indirectly associated with better glycemic control through improved diabetes self-management (95% CI 0.004-0.927). These effects were not observed among urban veterans with diabetes (95% CI -1.039 to 0.056). Rural patients were significantly more likely than urban patients to have diabetes-related content in their secure messages (P=.01).

Conclusions: More frequent SM use is associated with engaging in diabetes self-management, which, in turn, is associated with better diabetes control. Among rural patients with diabetes, SM use is indirectly associated with better diabetes control. Frequent patient-team communication through SM about diabetes-related content may help rural patients with diabetes self-management, resulting in better glycemic control.

Keywords: access; accessible; cross-sectional; data; diabetes; digital health; eHealth; messaging; patient portal; portal; risk; rural; secure messaging; self-management; support; urban; veteran.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Moderated mediation between secure messaging (SM) use in 2017 and percent time in control of hemoglobin A1c in 2018 (A1c%TIC), via diabetes self-management, moderated by rurality. Numbers represent parameter estimates. Model adjusts for age, gender, and income. *95% CI does not include 0.00 and P<.05.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. National Diabetes Statistics Report, 2017: Estimates of Diabetes and Its Burden in the United States. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [2021-11-04]. https://dev.diabetes.org/sites/default/files/2019-06/cdc-statistics-repo... .
    1. American Diabetes Association 6. Glycemic Targets: Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(Suppl 1):S55–S64. doi: 10.2337/dc18-S006.41/Supplement_1/S55 - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Diabetes Association Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2016 Abridged for Primary Care Providers. Clin Diabetes. 2016 Jan;34(1):3–21. doi: 10.2337/diaclin.34.1.3. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/26807004 3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Seaquist ER. Addressing the burden of diabetes. JAMA. 2014 Jun 11;311(22):2267–2268. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.6451.1878728 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhuo X, Zhang P, Hoerger TJ. Lifetime direct medical costs of treating type 2 diabetes and diabetic complications. Am J Prev Med. 2013 Sep;45(3):253–261. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.04.017.S0749-3797(13)00338-3 - DOI - PubMed