Reply: Hysterectomy Versus Hysteropexy at the Time of Native-Tissue Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
- PMID: 34807886
- DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001117
Reply: Hysterectomy Versus Hysteropexy at the Time of Native-Tissue Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared they have no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Chang OH, Shepherd JP, Ridgeway BM, et al. Hysterectomy versus hysteropexy at the time of native tissue pelvic organ prolapse repair: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2021;27(2):e277–e281.
-
- Meriwether KV, Antosh DD, Olivera CK, et al. Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018;219(2):129–146.e2.
-
- Husby KR, Larsen MD, Lose G, et al. Surgical treatment of primary uterine prolapse: a comparison of vaginal native tissue surgical techniques. Int Urogynecol J 2019;30(11):1887–1893.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical