Integrating shared decision-making into primary care: lessons learned from a multi-centre feasibility randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 34809626
- PMCID: PMC8609876
- DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01673-w
Integrating shared decision-making into primary care: lessons learned from a multi-centre feasibility randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Background: MyDiabetesPlan is a web-based, interactive patient decision aid that facilitates patient-centred, diabetes-specific, goal-setting and shared decision-making (SDM) with interprofessional health care teams.
Objective: Assess the feasibility of (1) conducting a cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) and (2) integrating MyDiabetesPlan into interprofessional primary care clinics.
Methods: We conducted a cluster RCT in 10 interprofessional primary care clinics with patients living with diabetes and at least two other comorbidities; half of the clinics were assigned to MyDiabetesPlan and half were assigned to usual care. To assess recruitment, retention, and resource use, we used RCT conduct logs and financial account summaries. To assess intervention fidelity, we used RCT conduct logs and website usage logs. To identify barriers and facilitators to integration of MyDiabetesPlan into clinical care across the IP team, we used audiotapes of clinical encounters in the intervention groups.
Results: One thousand five hundred and ninety-seven potentially eligible patients were identified through searches of electronic medical records, of which 1113 patients met the eligibility criteria upon detailed chart review. A total of 425 patients were randomly selected; of these, 213 were able to participate and were allocated (intervention: n = 102; control: n = 111), for a recruitment rate of 50.1%. One hundred and fifty-one patients completed the study, for a retention rate of 70.9%. A total of 5745 personnel-hours and $6104 CAD were attributed to recruitment and retention activities. A total of 179 appointments occurred (out of 204 expected appointments-two per participant over the 12-month study period; 87.7%). Forty (36%), 25 (23%), and 32 (29%) patients completed MyDiabetesPlan at least twice, once, and zero times, respectively. Mean time for completion of MyDiabetesPlan by the clinician and the patient during initial appointments was 37 min. From the clinical encounter transcripts, we identified diverse strategies used by clinicians and patients to integrate MyDiabetesPlan into the appointment, characterized by rapport building and individualization. Barriers to use included clinician-related, patient-related, and technical factors.
Conclusion: An interprofessional approach to SDM using a decision aid was feasible. Lower than expected numbers of diabetes-specific appointments and use of MyDiabetesPlan were observed. Addressing facilitators and barriers identified in this study will promote more seamless integration into clinical care. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02379078. Date of Registration: February 11, 2015. Protocol version: Version 1; February 26, 2015.
Keywords: Cluster randomized controlled trial; Diabetes mellitus; Interprofessional care; Medical informatics; Patient decision aid; Patient education; Priority setting; Qualitative methods; Shared decision-making.
© 2021. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Beyond pros and cons - developing a patient decision aid to cultivate dialog to build relationships: insights from a qualitative study and decision aid development.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Sep 18;19(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0898-5. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019. PMID: 31533828 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of MyDiabetesPlan, a Web-Based Patient Decision Aid on Decisional Conflict, Diabetes Distress, Quality of Life, and Chronic Illness Care in Patients With Diabetes: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 30;22(9):e16984. doi: 10.2196/16984. J Med Internet Res. 2020. PMID: 32996893 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
"In my age, we didn't have the computers": Using a complexity lens to understand uptake of diabetes eHealth innovations into primary care-A qualitative study.PLoS One. 2021 Jul 7;16(7):e0254157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254157. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34234368 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Impact of an interprofessional shared decision-making and goal-setting decision aid for patients with diabetes on decisional conflict--study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2015 Jun 27;16:286. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0797-8. Trials. 2015. PMID: 26116444 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Shared Decision Making Among Racially and/or Ethnically Diverse Populations in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators.Ann Fam Med. 2025 Mar 24;23(2):108-116. doi: 10.1370/afm.240087. Ann Fam Med. 2025. PMID: 40127976 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Development and Early Experience of a Primary Care Learning Collaborative in a Large Health Care System.J Prim Care Community Health. 2022 Jan-Dec;13:21501319221089775. doi: 10.1177/21501319221089775. J Prim Care Community Health. 2022. PMID: 35603490 Free PMC article.
-
Improving the Process of Shared Decision-Making by Integrating Online Structured Information and Self-Assessment Tools.J Pers Med. 2022 Feb 10;12(2):256. doi: 10.3390/jpm12020256. J Pers Med. 2022. PMID: 35207744 Free PMC article.
-
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 29;1(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub6. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38284415 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Serrano V, Rodriguez-Gutierrez R, Hargraves I, Gionfriddo MR, Tamhane S, Montori VM. Shared decision-making in the care of individuals with diabetes. Diabet Med. 2016;33(6):742–751. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous