Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 23:10:e70330.
doi: 10.7554/eLife.70330.

Cross-reactive antibodies after SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination

Collaborators, Affiliations

Cross-reactive antibodies after SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination

Marloes Grobben et al. Elife. .

Abstract

Current SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are losing efficacy against emerging variants and may not protect against future novel coronavirus outbreaks, emphasizing the need for more broadly protective vaccines. To inform the development of a pan-coronavirus vaccine, we investigated the presence and specificity of cross-reactive antibodies against the spike (S) proteins of human coronaviruses (hCoV) after SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination. We found an 11- to 123-fold increase in antibodies binding to SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV as well as a 2- to 4-fold difference in antibodies binding to seasonal hCoVs in COVID-19 convalescent sera compared to pre-pandemic healthy donors, with the S2 subdomain of the S protein being the main target for cross-reactivity. In addition, we detected cross-reactive antibodies to all hCoV S proteins after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in macaques and humans, with higher responses for hCoV more closely related to SARS-CoV-2. These findings support the feasibility of and provide guidance for development of a pan-coronavirus vaccine.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; antibodies; coronavirus; cross-reactivity; human; immunology; infectious disease; inflammation; microbiology; vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

MG, Kv, PB, MB, PM, ND, BA, AL, Lv, JB, MP, MO, DE, TB, Hv, EW, BV, OF, Pd, TB, MB, JS, RL, Md, MP, AC, Gd, RS, Mv No competing interests declared

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. SARS-CoV-2 antibody response in COVID-19 patients.
(a) IgG binding of sera to SARS-CoV-2 S protein measured with a custom Luminex assay. Convalescent COVID-19 sera (COVID-19, blue dots, n = 50) were compared to sera of pre-pandemic healthy donors (HD, gray squares, n = 30) using a Mann–Whitney U test. The cohort of COVID-19 patients was subdivided according to admission status, sex, and age. Admission status is indicated with orange dots for hospitalized patients (Yes) and green dots if no admission to hospital was needed (No). (b) SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus neutralization capacity compared between hospitalized patients (orange dots) and patients that did not need admission to hospital (green dots) (left). The correlation between the SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus neutralization and SARS-CoV-2 S antibody levels in the Luminex assay was determined using Spearman’s correlation (right). (c) A principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using the following variables: IgG antibodies binding to SARS-CoV-2 S protein (S), RBD and nucleocapsid protein (N), SARS-CoV-2 neutralization, age and days since symptom onset (DSSO). Admission status is indicated with orange dots for hospitalized patients and green dots if no admission to hospital was needed (left). Loading of the principal component (PC) plot by each variable is indicated with colored arrows to visualize the contribution of each variable on PC 1 and 2 (right). ns, not significant; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001. MFI, median fluorescent intensity; S, spike protein; ID50, serum dilution at which 50% of pseudovirus is neutralized; r, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient.
Figure 1—figure supplement 1.
Figure 1—figure supplement 1.. Principal component analysis showing the influence of sex and disease severity on the SARS-CoV-2 IgG response.
A principal component analysis was performed using the following variables: IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 S protein (S), RBD and nucleocapsid protein (N), SARS-CoV-2 neutralization, age and days since symptom onset (DSSO). Patients were subdivided based on sex (a) and WHO severity score (b). A description of the WHO severity scoring is found in Supplementary file 1. The loading of the principal component plot by each variable is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Cross-reactivity to hCoV S proteins in convalescent COVID-19 sera.
(a) IgG binding to all hCoV S proteins measured with a custom Luminex assay in convalescent COVID-19 sera (COVID-19, blue dots, n = 50) were compared to pre-pandemic sera from healthy donors (HD, gray squares, n = 30) using a Mann–Whitney U test. Box plots range the minimum and maximum values. **p<0.01; ****p<0.0001. Serum IgG binding to the tetanus toxoid control protein is shown in Supplementary file 2a. (b) Percent decrease of IgG binding to all other hCoV S proteins in COVID-19 patient sera (n = 50) after depletion with soluble recombinant SARS-CoV-2 S protein. Bars represent the mean decrease of binding IgG as a percentage of the total binding IgG observed in undepleted sera, and error bars represent the standard deviation. Dots represent the percent decrease of binding IgG observed in individual sera. The percent decrease of IgG binding to tetanus toxoid control protein in patient sera and healthy donor sera after SARS-CoV-2 S protein depletion is shown in Figure 2—figure supplement 1b and c, respectively, and depletion of hCoV S IgG binding in healthy donor sera is shown in Figure 2—figure supplement 1d. All absolute median fluorescent intensity (MFI) values are shown in Figure 3—figure supplement 1a and Figure 3—figure supplement 2a. S, spike protein.
Figure 2—figure supplement 1.
Figure 2—figure supplement 1.. Antibody reactivity to tetanus toxoid in convalescent COVID-19 sera and depletion of antibodies binding to all proteins in healthy donors.
(a) IgG binding to tetanus toxoid protein measured with a custom Luminex assay in sera of convalescent COVID-19 sera (COVID-19, orange dots, n = 50) compared to sera of pre-pandemic healthy donors (HD, gray squares, n = 30) using a Mann–Whitney U test. Box plots range the minimum and maximum values. Ns, nonsignificant. (b) Percent decrease of IgG binding to tetanus toxoid protein in COVID-19 patient sera (n = 50) after depletion with soluble recombinant SARS-CoV-2 S protein. (c) Percent decrease of IgG binding to tetanus toxoid protein after depletion with soluble recombinant SARS-CoV-2 S protein in healthy donors (n = 30), and (d) percent decrease of IgG binding to hCoV S proteins after depletion with soluble recombinant SARS-CoV-2 S protein in healthy donors (n = 30). Bars represent the mean decrease of binding IgG as a percentage of the total binding IgG observed in undepleted sera of all COVID-19 patients (b) or healthy donors (c, d), and error bars represent the standard deviation. Dots represent the percent decrease of binding IgG in individual sera. All median fluorescent intensity (MFI) values are shown in Figure 3—figure supplements 1 and 2.
Figure 2—figure supplement 2.
Figure 2—figure supplement 2.. Correlation between sequence identity and reduction of cross-reactive antibodies in depletion assay for S, S1, and S2.
The correlation between S protein (a), S1 subdomain (b), and S2 subdomain (c) sequence identity of SARS-CoV-2 with the different hCoV S proteins (also shown in Supplementary file 2) and the reduction of antibodies binding to hCoV S proteins in the SARS-CoV-2 S protein depletion assay (also shown in Figure 2b) was determined using Spearman’s correlation. S, spike protein; r, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient.
Figure 2—figure supplement 3.
Figure 2—figure supplement 3.. Spearman’s correlations between SARS-CoV-2 neutralization and antibody reactivity to hCoV S and tetanus toxoid.
The correlation between the SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus neutralization (also shown in Figure 1b) and binding IgG binding measured with a custom Luminex assay (also shown in Figure 2a) in sera of convalescent COVID-19 patients (n = 50) was determined using Spearman’s correlation. MFI, median fluorescent intensity; S, spike protein; ID50, serum dilution at which 50% of pseudovirus is neutralized; r, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient.
Figure 2—figure supplement 4.
Figure 2—figure supplement 4.. Principal component analysis including SARS-CoV-2 binding antibodies, neutralization, clinical characteristics, and cross-reactivity.
The principal component analysis was performed using the following variables: IgG binding to all hCoV S proteins including SARS-CoV-2, IgG binding to SARS-CoV-2 RBD and nucleocapsid protein (N), SARS-CoV-2 neutralization, patient age and days since symptom onset (DSSO). Color indicates the difference between patients that needed hospitalization (orange) or stayed in home quarantine (green) (top left), between males (gray) and females (purple) (bottom left), and between patients with different WHO severity scores (bottom right, description of scoring is found in Supplementary file 1). The loading of each variable for principal component (PCs) 1 and 2 is shown (top right).
Figure 2—figure supplement 5.
Figure 2—figure supplement 5.. Native PAGE analysis of hCoV proteins.
Photographs of colloidal blue stainings of 4–12% NuPAGE Bis-Tris gels showing protein integrity and composition of the trimeric human coronavirus spike proteins. Marker sizes are indicated in kilo Dalton. Lane contents: (M) Marker HMW-Native Protein Mixture; (1) SARS-CoV spike; (2) MERS-CoV spike; (3) hCoV-229E spike; (4) hCoV-OC43 spike; (5) SARS-CoV-2 spike; (6) hCoV-HKU1 spike; and (7) hCoV-NL63 spike.
Figure 2—figure supplement 6.
Figure 2—figure supplement 6.. Reproducibility of the Luminex assay.
The reproducibility of the custom Luminex assay is shown by plotting data from two independent assays performed on different days with the same samples. The data on the Y axis are found in Figure 3, and the data on the X axis are also found in Figures 1 and 2. The quality of the replicates is presented by the R2 and slope of a simple linear regression performed on the log10 transformed median fluorescent intensity (MFI) data. S, spike protein; N, nucleocapsid; RBD, receptor binding domain.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Depletion of S1 and S2 subdomain-specific cross-reactivity in convalescent COVID-19 sera.
Percent decrease of IgG binding to all other hCoV S proteins in convalescent COVID-19 sera (n = 50) after depletion with soluble recombinant monomeric SARS-CoV-2 S1 or S2 subdomains. Bars represent the mean decrease of binding IgG as a percentage of the total binding IgG observed in undepleted sera, and error bars represent the standard deviation. Dots represent the percent decrease of binding IgG observed in individual sera. Percent decrease of IgG binding to tetanus toxoid control protein in patient sera after SARS-CoV-2 S1 and S2 depletion is shown in Figure 3—figure supplement 1a. The percent decrease of IgG binding to hCoV S and tetanus toxoid protein in healthy donor sera after SARS-CoV-2 S1 and S2 depletion is shown in Figure 3—figure supplement 1b and c. All absolute median fluorescent intensity (MFI) values are shown in Figure 3—figure supplement 1a and Figure 3—figure supplement 2a. S, spike protein.
Figure 3—figure supplement 1.
Figure 3—figure supplement 1.. Raw data and control data from depletion assays on convalescent COVID-19 sera.
(a) Median fluorescent intensity (MFI) values of IgG binding to all hCoV S proteins and tetanus toxoid control protein, measured with a custom Luminex assay in sera of convalescent COVID-19 sera (n = 50) after depletion with soluble recombinant SARS-CoV-2 S protein, S1 subdomain, and S2 subdomain. Box plots range the minimum and maximum values. -, undepleted sera; S, trimeric S protein-depleted sera; S1, S1 subdomain-depleted sera; S2, S2 subdomain-depleted sera. (b) Percent decrease of IgG binding to tetanus toxoid control protein in sera of convalescent COVID-19 patients (n = 50) after depletion with soluble recombinant SARS-CoV-2 S1 or S2 subdomain. Bars represent the mean decrease of binding IgG as a percentage of the total binding IgG observed in undepleted sera of all COVID-19 patients, and error bars represent the standard deviation. Dots represent the percent decrease found in individual patient sera. S, spike protein.
Figure 3—figure supplement 2.
Figure 3—figure supplement 2.. Raw data and control data from depletion assays on healthy donor sera.
(a) Median fluorescent intensity (MFI) values of IgG binding to all hCoV S proteins (top and middle rows) and control proteins (bottom row) measured with a custom Luminex assay in sera of pre-pandemic healthy donors (n = 30) after depletion with soluble recombinant SARS-CoV-2 S protein, S1 subdomain, and S2 subdomain. Box plots range the minimum and maximum values. -, undepleted sera; S, trimeric S protein-depleted sera; S1, S1 subdomain-depleted sera; S2, S2 subdomain-depleted sera. (b) Percent decrease of IgG binding to hCoV S proteins in sera of healthy donors (n = 30) after depletion with soluble recombinant SARS-CoV-2 S1 subdomain or S2 subdomain. (C) Percent decrease of IgG binding to tetanus toxoid control protein in sera of healthy donors (n = 30) after depletion with soluble recombinant SARS-CoV-2 S1 subdomain or S2 subdomain. Bars represent the mean decrease of binding antibodies as a percentage of the total binding IgG observed in undepleted sera of all healthy donors, and error bars represent the standard deviation. Dots represent the percent decrease of binding IgG found in individual sera. S, spike protein.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Cross-reactivity and depletion of cross-reactivity to hCoV S proteins in immunized macaques.
(a) SARS-CoV-2 S protein-specific IgG binding and cross-reactive IgG binding to SARS-CoV S protein at week 0 (pre-immunization baseline) and week 12 (after a total of three immunizations), measured with a custom Luminex assay in 1:50,000 diluted serum of six cynomolgus macaques immunized with a SARS-CoV-2 S nanoparticle vaccine (left) and cross-reactive IgG binding to all other hCoV S proteins, measured in 1:500 diluted serum in the same animals (right). Bars represent the geometric mean of the six animals, and error bars the geometric standard deviation; dots represent the individual animals, statistical comparisons used a Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. IgG binding to hCoV S and tetanus toxoid control protein at weeks 2–12 is shown in Figure 4—figure supplement 1a and b, and IgG binding to tetanus toxoid control protein at weeks 0 and 12 is shown in Figure 4—figure supplement 1c. *p<0.05. (b) Percent decrease of IgG binding to all hCoV S proteins after depletion with soluble recombinant SARS-CoV-2 S protein. Bars represent the mean decrease of binding IgG as a percentage of the total binding IgG observed in undepleted sera of the six cynomolgus macaques at week 12, and error bars represent the standard deviation. Dots represent the percent decrease of binding IgG observed in individual sera. The percent decrease of IgG binding to tetanus toxoid control protein is shown in Figure 4—figure supplement 2b, and all median fluorescent intensity (MFI) values are shown in Figure 4—figure supplement 2a. S, spike protein.
Figure 4—figure supplement 1.
Figure 4—figure supplement 1.. Antibodies binding to hCoV S and tetanus toxoid in immunized cynomolgus macaques over time.
(a) IgG response over time in serum of six cynomolgus macaques immunized at weeks 0, 4, and 10 with a SARS-CoV-2 spike nanoparticle vaccine, measured at 1:50,000 serum dilution for SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV S and at 1:500 serum dilution for MERS-CoV, hCoV-OC43, hCoV-HKU1, hCoV-229E, and hCoV-NL63-CoV S. (b) IgG binding to tetanus toxoid control protein, measured in 1:500 diluted serum. All median fluorescent intensity (MFI) values are background corrected by subtraction of beads and buffer only wells. (c) IgG binding to tetanus toxoid control protein at week 0 (pre-immunization baseline) and week 12 (after a total of three immunizations), presented in a bar chart for comparison with Figure 4a. ns, not significant; S, spike protein.
Figure 4—figure supplement 2.
Figure 4—figure supplement 2.. Reactivity and depletion of antibodies to hCoV S proteins and tetanus toxoid in immunized cynomolgus macaques.
(a) Median fluorescent intensity (MFI) values of IgG binding to all hCoV S proteins and tetanus toxoid control protein with and without depletion with soluble recombinant SARS-CoV-2 S protein, measured by Luminex assay in 1:50,000 diluted serum (for SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV) or 1:500 diluted serum (for all other proteins) for six cynomolgus macaques immunized at weeks 0, 4, and 10 with a SARS-CoV-2 S protein nanoparticle vaccine. The line indicates the geometric mean. (b) Percent decrease of IgG binding to tetanus toxoid control protein in 1:500 diluted sera at week 12 after depletion with soluble recombinant SARS-CoV-2 S protein, presented in bar charts for comparison with Figure 4b. Bars represent the mean decrease of binding IgG as a percentage of the total binding IgG observed in undepleted sera of the six cynomolgus macaques. Dots represent the percent decrease of binding IgG in each individual animal. S, spike protein.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.. Cross-reactivity to hCoV S proteins following COVID-19 mRNA vaccination in human IgG binding to hCoVs S proteins measured with a custom Luminex assay in 1:100,000 diluted serum of 45 SARS-CoV-2-naïve individuals at baseline (gray dots), 3 weeks after their first vaccination (blue dots) and 4 weeks after their second vaccination (dark blue dots) with Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine.
IgG binding to tetanus toxoid control protein is shown in Figure 5—figure supplement 1. Friedman test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test was used to compare medians of different time points and correct for multiple testing. Box plots range the minimum and maximum values. ns, not significant; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001.
Figure 5—figure supplement 1.
Figure 5—figure supplement 1.. Antibodies binding to tetanus toxoid protein following Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccination in humans.
IgG binding to tetanus toxoid control protein measured with a custom Luminex assay in 1:100,000 diluted sera of vaccinated SARS-CoV-2-naïve individuals at baseline, at 3 weeks after their first vaccination and 4 weeks after their second vaccination. Friedman test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons was used to compare medians of different time points and correct for multiple testing. Box plots range the minimum and maximum values. ns, not significant; ****p<0.0001.

References

    1. Anderson EM, Goodwin EC, Verma A, Arevalo CP, Bolton MJ, Weirick ME, Gouma S, McAllister CM, Christensen SR, Weaver J, Hicks P, Manzoni TB, Oniyide O, Ramage H, Mathew D, Baxter AE, Oldridge DA, Greenplate AR, Wu JE, Alanio C, D’Andrea K, Kuthuru O, Dougherty J, Pattekar A, Kim J, Han N, Apostolidis SA, Huang AC, Vella LA, Kuri-Cervantes L, Pampena MB, UPenn COVID Processing Unit. Betts MR, Wherry EJ, Meyer NJ, Cherry S, Bates P, Rader DJ, Hensley SE. Seasonal human coronavirus antibodies are boosted upon SARS-CoV-2 infection but not associated with protection. Cell. 2021;184:1858–1864. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.02.010. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Appelman B, van der Straten K, Lavell AHA, Schinkel M, Slim MA, Poniman M, Burger JA, Oomen M, Tejjani K, Vlaar APJ, Wiersinga WJ, Smulders YM, van Vught LA, Sanders RW, van Gils MJ, Bomers MK, Sikkens JJ, Amsterdam UMC COVID-19 S3/HCW study group Time since SARS-CoV-2 infection and humoral immune response following BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination. EBioMedicine. 2021;72:103589. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103589. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arvin AM, Fink K, Schmid MA, Cathcart A, Spreafico R, Havenar-Daughton C, Lanzavecchia A, Corti D, Virgin HW. A perspective on potential antibody-dependent enhancement of SARS-CoV-2. Nature. 2020;584:353–363. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2538-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aydillo T, Rombauts A, Stadlbauer D, Aslam S, Abelenda-Alonso G, Escalera A, Amanat F, Jiang K, Krammer F, Carratala J, García-Sastre A. Immunological imprinting of the antibody response in COVID-19 patients. Nature Communications. 2021;12:3781. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23977-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baden LR, El Sahly HM, Essink B, Kotloff K, Frey S, Novak R, Diemert D, Spector SA, Rouphael N, Creech CB, McGettigan J, Khetan S, Segall N, Solis J, Brosz A, Fierro C, Schwartz H, Neuzil K, Corey L, Gilbert P, Janes H, Follmann D, Marovich M, Mascola J, Polakowski L, Ledgerwood J, Graham BS, Bennett H, Pajon R, Knightly C, Leav B, Deng W, Zhou H, Han S, Ivarsson M, Miller J, Zaks T, COVE Study Group Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2021;384:403–416. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2035389. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms