Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 7;61(11):e202109933.
doi: 10.1002/anie.202109933. Epub 2022 Feb 3.

HFIP Mediates a Direct C-C Coupling between Michael Acceptors and Eschenmoser's salt

Affiliations

HFIP Mediates a Direct C-C Coupling between Michael Acceptors and Eschenmoser's salt

Miran Lemmerer et al. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. .

Abstract

A direct C-C coupling process that merges Michael acceptors and Eschenmoser's salt is presented. Although reminiscent of the Morita-Baylis-Hillman reaction, this process requires no Lewis base catalyst. The underlying mechanism was unveiled by a combination of kinetic, isotopic labelling experiments as well as computational investigations, which showcased the critical role of HFIP as a superior mediator for proton-transfer events as well as the decisive role of the halide counterion.

Keywords: Amines; Hydrogen bonds; Iodine; Quantum chemistry; Solvent effects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Scheme 1
Scheme 1
a) The Morita–Baylis–Hillman reaction. b) A catalyst‐free variant relying on Eschenmoser's salt and HFIP.
Scheme 2
Scheme 2
a) Solvolysis of Eschenmoser's and Böhme's salt in HFIP at the optimised concentration and the computed relative Gibbs free energies for the dissociation event. b) DFT‐optimized structures of the (CH3)2NCH2X*3HFIP molecular clusters found through the use of extensive metadynamic sampling.
Scheme 3
Scheme 3
Reaction scope of the MBH‐type coupling of Michael acceptors and Eschenmoser's salt. The reaction was carried out on a 0.2 mmol scale; a) 79 % NMR yield, b) 84 % NMR yield, c) reaction conducted at room temperature, d) 75 % NMR yield, e) 4 equiv Eschenmoser's salt were used.
Scheme 4
Scheme 4
Experimental observations regarding the mechanism.
Scheme 5
Scheme 5
Proposed mechanism (a) and computed relative Gibbs free energy profiles (b)–(e) in the proton‐transfer steps for HFIP (green) and iPrOH (brown). The relative free energies are presented in kcal mol−1 for each proton‐transfer step individually having the respective reactant complex as a reference (0.0 kcal mol−1).
Scheme 6
Scheme 6
Derivatisation of aza‐MBH products. a) A [2,3]‐Stevens‐type alkylation/rearrangement cascade. b) A direct synthesis of zwitterionic amino acids. 7a_CCDC_2079100; 7c_CCDC_2079101; 7d_CCDC 2079099.

References

    1. None
    1. Morita K., Suzuki Z., Hirose H., Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1968, 41, 2815–2815;
    1. Hillman M. E. D., Baylis A. B., German Patent 2155113, 1972.
    1. None
    1. Ciganek E. in Organic Reactions, Vol. 51 (Ed.: Paquette L. A.), Wiley, New York, 1997, pp. 201–350;

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources