Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr;44(4):401-409.
doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1998401. Epub 2021 Nov 23.

Assessing the predictive validity of the UCAT-A systematic review and narrative synthesis

Affiliations

Assessing the predictive validity of the UCAT-A systematic review and narrative synthesis

Laksha Bala et al. Med Teach. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Background: The University Clinical Aptitude Test (UCAT) is an admissions assessment used by a consortium of universities across the UK, Australia, and New Zealand, to aid the selection of applicants to medical and dental degree programmes. The UCAT aims to measure the mental aptitude and professional behaviours required to become successful doctors and dentists. We conducted a systematic review to establish the predictive value of the UCAT across measures of performance at undergraduate and post-graduate levels.

Methods: A literature search was conducted in April 2020 using eight electronic databases: MEDLINE, APA PsycInfo, SCOPUS, Web of Science, EThOS, OpenGrey, PROSPERO, and the UCAT website. Data were extracted from selected studies and tabulated as results matrices. A narrative synthesis was performed.

Results: Twenty-four studies satisfied our inclusion criteria, 23 of which were deemed to be of good quality (using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale). For over 70% of univariate data points, the UCAT exerted no statistically significant predictive validity; for the remainder, predictive power was weak. The cognitive total and verbal reasoning subtests had the largest evidence base as weakly positive predictors of academic performance. The SJT subtest was a weak predictor of professional behaviour during medical school. Studies specific to dental schools demonstrated variable findings across the five studies. Only 1 study looked at post-graduate outcome measures and demonstrated that the UCAT was not a predictor of health- or conduct-related fitness to practice declarations at GMC registration.

Conclusions: These data provide some support for the use of cognitive total and verbal reasoning subtests as part of medical school selection. Further research is needed to investigate outcomes beyond professional registration and for dental students.

Keywords: Assessment; UCAT; medicine; predictive; validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

C.B. is Deputy Admissions Lead at Warwick Medical School, which uses the UCAT as part of the admissions process. Warwick Medical School is therefore a member of the UCAT Consortium. This review was conducted independently of the UCAT consortium.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA flow diagram of search and study selection process.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality . 2012. Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment form for cohort studies. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK115843/bin/appe-fm3.pdf
    1. Adam J, Bore M, Childs R, Dunn J, Mckendree J, Munro D, Powis D.. 2015. Predictors of professional behaviour and academic outcomes in a UK medical school: a longitudinal cohort study. Med Teach. 37(9):868–880. - PubMed
    1. Adam J, Bore M, McKendree J, Munro D, Powis D.. 2012. Can personal qualities of medical students predict in-course examination success and professional behaviour? An exploratory prospective cohort study. BMC Med Educ. 12:69. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adam J, Dowell J, Greatrix R.. 2011. Use of UKCAT scores in student selection by U.K. medical schools, 2006–2010. BMC Med Educ. 11:98. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bloxham S, Boyd P.. 2007. Developing effective assessment in higher education. A practical guide. Maidenhead: Oxford University Press.

Publication types