Assessing the predictive validity of the UCAT-A systematic review and narrative synthesis
- PMID: 34813410
- PMCID: PMC9162495
- DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1998401
Assessing the predictive validity of the UCAT-A systematic review and narrative synthesis
Abstract
Background: The University Clinical Aptitude Test (UCAT) is an admissions assessment used by a consortium of universities across the UK, Australia, and New Zealand, to aid the selection of applicants to medical and dental degree programmes. The UCAT aims to measure the mental aptitude and professional behaviours required to become successful doctors and dentists. We conducted a systematic review to establish the predictive value of the UCAT across measures of performance at undergraduate and post-graduate levels.
Methods: A literature search was conducted in April 2020 using eight electronic databases: MEDLINE, APA PsycInfo, SCOPUS, Web of Science, EThOS, OpenGrey, PROSPERO, and the UCAT website. Data were extracted from selected studies and tabulated as results matrices. A narrative synthesis was performed.
Results: Twenty-four studies satisfied our inclusion criteria, 23 of which were deemed to be of good quality (using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale). For over 70% of univariate data points, the UCAT exerted no statistically significant predictive validity; for the remainder, predictive power was weak. The cognitive total and verbal reasoning subtests had the largest evidence base as weakly positive predictors of academic performance. The SJT subtest was a weak predictor of professional behaviour during medical school. Studies specific to dental schools demonstrated variable findings across the five studies. Only 1 study looked at post-graduate outcome measures and demonstrated that the UCAT was not a predictor of health- or conduct-related fitness to practice declarations at GMC registration.
Conclusions: These data provide some support for the use of cognitive total and verbal reasoning subtests as part of medical school selection. Further research is needed to investigate outcomes beyond professional registration and for dental students.
Keywords: Assessment; UCAT; medicine; predictive; validity.
Conflict of interest statement
C.B. is Deputy Admissions Lead at Warwick Medical School, which uses the UCAT as part of the admissions process. Warwick Medical School is therefore a member of the UCAT Consortium. This review was conducted independently of the UCAT consortium.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Insights into undergraduate medical student selection tools: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2024;21:22. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2024.21.22. Epub 2024 Sep 12. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2024. PMID: 39260821 Free PMC article.
-
UCAT and dental student selection in the UK - what has changed?Br Dent J. 2022 Mar;232(5):333-338. doi: 10.1038/s41415-022-4011-6. Epub 2022 Mar 11. Br Dent J. 2022. PMID: 35277632 Free PMC article.
-
The change from UMAT to UCAT for undergraduate medical school applicants: impact on selection outcomes.Med J Aust. 2021 Feb;214(2):84-89. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50877. Epub 2020 Nov 30. Med J Aust. 2021. PMID: 33258184
-
Can achievement at medical admission tests predict future performance in postgraduate clinical assessments? A UK-based national cohort study.BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 8;12(2):e056129. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056129. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35135776 Free PMC article.
-
Does the UKCAT predict performance in medical and dental school? A systematic review.BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 22;11(1):e040128. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040128. BMJ Open. 2021. PMID: 33483439 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Beyond admission scores: evaluating GAT, SAAT, and English proficiency as predictors of physics performance in health science education.Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 8;12:1595079. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1595079. eCollection 2025. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025. PMID: 40697909 Free PMC article.
-
The effects of language proficiency and awareness of time limit in animated vs. text-based situational judgment tests.BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 15;24(1):540. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05513-z. BMC Med Educ. 2024. PMID: 38750433 Free PMC article.
-
Insights into undergraduate medical student selection tools: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2024;21:22. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2024.21.22. Epub 2024 Sep 12. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2024. PMID: 39260821 Free PMC article.
-
BMAT's predictive validity for medical school performance: A retrospective cohort study.Med Educ. 2022 Sep;56(9):936-948. doi: 10.1111/medu.14819. Epub 2022 May 16. Med Educ. 2022. PMID: 35514145 Free PMC article.
-
Is the awarding gap at UK medical schools influenced by ethnicity and medical school attended? A retrospective cohort study.BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 12;13(12):e075945. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075945. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 38086586 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality . 2012. Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment form for cohort studies. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK115843/bin/appe-fm3.pdf
-
- Adam J, Bore M, Childs R, Dunn J, Mckendree J, Munro D, Powis D.. 2015. Predictors of professional behaviour and academic outcomes in a UK medical school: a longitudinal cohort study. Med Teach. 37(9):868–880. - PubMed
-
- Bloxham S, Boyd P.. 2007. Developing effective assessment in higher education. A practical guide. Maidenhead: Oxford University Press.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous