Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2022 Jul 1;11(7):1225-1227.
doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.140. Epub 2021 Oct 3.

"A Promise Unfulfilled": Stakeholder Influence and the 2018 UN High-Level Meeting on NCDs Comment on "Competing Frames in Global Health Governance: An Analysis of Stakeholder Influence on the Political Declaration on Non-communicable Diseases"

Affiliations
Comment

"A Promise Unfulfilled": Stakeholder Influence and the 2018 UN High-Level Meeting on NCDs Comment on "Competing Frames in Global Health Governance: An Analysis of Stakeholder Influence on the Political Declaration on Non-communicable Diseases"

Johanna Ralston. Int J Health Policy Manag. .

Abstract

In recognition of the global burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), the past decade has seen three United Nations High-Level Meetings (UN HLMs) on NCDs. Yet progress in terms of political or financial commitments has been very slow. At the 2018 meeting, a political declaration was approved but featured language that had been watered down in terms of commitments. In "Competing Frames of Global Health Governance: An Analysis of Stakeholder Influence on the Political Declaration on Non-communicable Diseases," Suzuki et al analyze the documents that were submitted by Member States, non-governmental organizations and the private sector during the consultation period and conclude that the private sector and several high-income countries (HICs) appeared to oppose regulatory frameworks for products associated with NCDs, that wealthier countries resisted financing commitments, and that general power asymmetries affected the final document. This comment supports their findings and provides additional considerations for why the NCD response has yet to produce significant commitments.

Keywords: High-Level Meeting; Industry; Lived Experience; Multisectoral; NCD Targets; Non-communicable Diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. UN Secretary General. A/72/662. Progress on the Prevention and Control of Non-Communicable Diseases. New York: UN Secretary General; 2017.
    1. Suzuki M, Webb D, Small R. Competing frames in global health governance: an analysis of stakeholder influence on the political declaration on non-communicable diseases. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022;11(7):1078–1089. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.257. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thompson R, Garry S. The political economy of NCDs, and the limits of global health. Lancet. 2019;393(10177):1186–1187. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30432-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. UN Secretary General. A/RES/68/300. Outcome Document of the High-Level Meeting of the General Assembly on the Comprehensive Review and Assessment of the Progress Achieved in the Prevention and Control of Non-communicable Diseases. New York: UN Secretary General; 2014.
    1. Nugent RA, Feigl AB. Where Have All the Donors Gone? Scarce Donor Funding for Non-Communicable Diseases. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development; 2010. http://www.cgdev.org/content/publications/detail/1424546www.cgdev.org.