Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 23;22(1):155.
doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00721-4.

A genetic researcher's devil's dilemma: Warn relatives about their genetic risk or respect confidentiality agreements with research participants?

Lieke M van den Heuvel  1   2   3 , Els L M Maeckelberghe #  4 , M Corrette Ploem #  5 , Imke Christiaans #  6
Affiliations

A genetic researcher's devil's dilemma: Warn relatives about their genetic risk or respect confidentiality agreements with research participants?

Lieke M van den Heuvel et al. BMC Med Ethics. .

Abstract

Background: With advances in sequencing technologies, increasing numbers of people are being informed about a genetic disease identified in their family. In current practice, probands (the first person in a family in whom a genetic predisposition is identified) are asked to inform at-risk relatives about the diagnosis. However, previous research has shown that relatives are sometimes not informed due to barriers such as family conflicts. Research on family communication in genetic diseases aims to explore the difficulties encountered in informing relatives and to identify ways to support probands in this.

Main body: Research on family communication may also reveal that participants did not inform their relatives about the risk of a serious genetic condition, even when preventive and treatment options are available. Researchers may then face a dilemma: Do they need to warn at-risk relatives about the finding? Or do they keep silent due to prior confidentiality agreements with study participants?

Conclusions: We believe that the absolute confidence promised to research participants outweighs the interests of their relatives, even though it can be claimed that relatives at risk of a genetic disease do, in principle, have a right to know information collected about their health. Not respecting confidentiality agreements could cause distrust between researchers and research participants and possibly harm the relationship between probands and relatives. Relatives' health interests can still be taken into account without jeopardizing participant trust, by considering alternative scenarios, including sharing general study findings on the barriers participants experience with their healthcare professionals and by offering participants psychosocial support for family communication.

Keywords: Duty to warn; Family communication research; Genetic risk; Informing at-risk relatives.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Menko FH, Jeanson KN, Bleiker EMA, van Tiggelen CWM, Hogervorst FBL, Ter Stege JA, et al. The uptake of predictive DNA testing in 40 families with a pathogenic BRCA1/BRCA2 variant. An evaluation of the proband-mediated procedure. Eur J Hum Genet. 2020;28:1020–1027. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-0618-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miller EM, Wang Y, Ware SM. Uptake of cardiac screening and genetic testing among hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathy families. J Gen Counsel. 2013;22:258–267. doi: 10.1007/s10897-012-9544-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Joly Y, Ngueng Feze I, Simard J. Genetic discrimination and life insurance: a systematic review of the evidence. BMC Med. 2013 doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-25. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oliveri S, Ferrari F, Manfrinati A, Pravettoni G. A systematic review of the psychological implications of genetic testing: a comparative analysis among cardiovascular, neurodegenerative and cancer diseases. Front Genet. 2018 doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00624. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leenen CH, Heijer M, van der Meer C, Kuipers EJ, van Leerdam ME, Wagner A. Genetic testing for Lynch syndrome: family communication and motivation. Fam Cancer. 2016;15:63–73. doi: 10.1007/s10689-015-9842-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types