Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct;11(5):1047-1057.
doi: 10.21037/cdt-21-373.

Impact of the revised hemodynamic definition on the diagnosis of precapillary pulmonary hypertension: a retrospective single-center study in China

Affiliations

Impact of the revised hemodynamic definition on the diagnosis of precapillary pulmonary hypertension: a retrospective single-center study in China

Qi Jin et al. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Background: In the 6th World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension (PH), the hemodynamic definition of PH was reduced from a mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) ≥25 to >20 mmHg. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the revised hemodynamic definition on the diagnosis of precapillary PH.

Methods: We retrospectively enrolled patients who underwent right heart catheterization from January 2012 to December 2018. All included patients were reassessed according to the revised hemodynamic definition.

Results: A total of 1,251 patients were included for analysis, of whom 1,044 patients had precapillary PH and 182 patients had mPAP <25 mmHg. After applying the revised definition, 33 (18.1%) of 182 patients with mPAP <25 mmHg were reclassified as having PH. However, only 7 of these 33 patients had a pulmonary vascular resistance ≥3 wood units and could be considered to have precapillary PH, accounting for 0.7% of the existing precapillary PH population. More importantly, 12 patients with mPAP ≥25 mmHg were delisted from precapillary PH for pulmonary vascular resistance <3 wood units (5 patients from Group III, 4 patients from Group IV, 3 patients from Group V). Overall, there was a net 0.5% decrease [(12-7)/1044×100%] in the population with precapillary PH.

Conclusions: The revised hemodynamic definition had a minor impact on the diagnosis of precapillary PH. It should be noted that the revised definition would influence not only patients with mPAP =21-24 mmHg, but also patients with mPAP ≥25 mmHg.

Keywords: Pulmonary hypertension; diagnosis; hemodynamics; precapillary pulmonary hypertension.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/cdt-21-373). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The differences in hemodynamic definitions among the 2009 ESC/ERS guidelines, 2015 ESC/ERS guidelines and 6th WSPH. CO, cardiac output; ERS, European Respiratory Society; ESC, European Society of Cardiology; mPAP, mean pulmonary arterial pressure; PAWP, pulmonary arterial wedge pressure; PVR, pulmonary vascular resistance; WSPH, World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flowchart of the included and excluded patients in our study. *, One IPAH and 4 CHD-PAH could no longer be subgrouped as Group I for PVR ≤3 wood units under the 2015 ESC/ERS guidelines. **, One PH associated with tumor obstruction and 4 PH associated with vasculitis were reclassified as Group IV. ***, All patients had congenital heart disease associated with pulmonary hypertension, but they could not be subgrouped as Group I for PVR ≤3 wood units under the 2015 ESC/ERS guidelines. CHD-PAH, pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with congenital heart disease; ERS, European Respiratory Society; ESC, European Society of Cardiology; IPAH, idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension; PAWP, pulmonary arterial wedge pressure; PH, pulmonary hypertension; PVR, pulmonary vascular resistance.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The 6th WSPH was used to reclassify PH patients diagnosed by the 2015 ESC/ERS guidelines. *, Those patients could no longer be considered as having precapillary PH due to PVR<3 wood units under the 6th WSPH criteria. #, The underlying etiology of the PH of the patients (mPAP 21–24 mmHg, PVR <3 wood units) is shown in Figure 4. $, All patients had chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. ERS, European Respiratory Society; ESC, European Society of Cardiology; mPAP, mean pulmonary arterial pressure; PH, pulmonary hypertension; PVR, pulmonary vascular resistance; WSPH, World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The underlying etiology of precapillary PH in 1,102 patients, stratified by mPAP and PVR. *, Classification is based on the 6th WSPH. **, One patient was diagnosed as IPAH by the 2009 ESC/ERS guidelines at first and then reclassified as having unclassifiable PH by the 2015 ESC/ERS guidelines due to PVR ≤3. Therefore, the underlying etiology of PH in this patient is considered unclear/multifactorial. The remaining 3 patients were from Group V as directly diagnosed by the 2015 ESC/ERS guidelines (see Figures 2,3). CHD, congenital heart disease; CTD, connective tissue diseases; CTE, chronic thromboembolism; CTEPH, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ERS, European Respiratory Society; ESC, European Society of Cardiology; IPAH, idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension; mPAP, mean pulmonary arterial pressure; PAWP, pulmonary arterial wedge pressure; PH, pulmonary hypertension; PVR, pulmonary vascular resistance.

References

    1. Galiè N, Humbert M, Vachiery JL, et al. 2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: The Joint Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS): Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). Eur Respir J 2015;46:903-75. 10.1183/13993003.01032-2015 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Galiè N, Hoeper MM, Humbert M, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS), endorsed by the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). Eur Heart J 2009;30:2493-537. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp297 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Simonneau G, Montani D, Celermajer DS, et al. Haemodynamic definitions and updated clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J 2019;53:1801913. 10.1183/13993003.01913-2018 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xanthouli P, Jordan S, Milde N, et al. Haemodynamic phenotypes and survival in patients with systemic sclerosis: the impact of the new definition of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Ann Rheum Dis 2020;79:370-8. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216476 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jaafar S, Visovatti S, Young A, et al. Impact of the revised haemodynamic definition on the diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension in patients with systemic sclerosis. Eur Respir J 2019;54:1900586. 10.1183/13993003.00586-2019 - DOI - PMC - PubMed