Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Oct 25:16:100493.
doi: 10.1016/j.ebr.2021.100493. eCollection 2021.

Extending the reach of science - Talk in plain language

Cassie Sedgwick  1 , Laura Belmonte  1 , Amanda Margolis  1 , Patricia Osborn Shafer  2 , Jennifer Pitterle  3 , Barry E Gidal  4
Affiliations
Review

Extending the reach of science - Talk in plain language

Cassie Sedgwick et al. Epilepsy Behav Rep. .

Abstract

There has been increasing interest by the general public to read and share mainstream medical and scientific literature. Consequently, more and more medical journals are adopting strategies to make complex literature more accessible to the lay public. One such strategy is the creation of so called "lay summaries". The benefits of lay summaries can include wider dissemination of knowledge, and is increasingly being recognized as a unique expertise by authors. While on the surface, it may seem to be an easy task to translate scientific literature into a lay summary. However, occasionally authors who are experienced in communicating complex information to a peer group, may struggle with translating their work to an audience with limited medical or scientific background. The objective of this review is to discuss strategies that scientific writers may consider to better facilitate translating scientific literature into lay summaries.

Keywords: Communication; Epilepsy; Lay summaries; Scientific writing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

    1. Dubé C.E., Lapane K.L. Lay abstracts and summaries: Writing advice for scientists. J Cancer Educ. 2014;29(3):577–579. doi: 10.1007/s13187-013-0570-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. What Is Health Literacy? n.d. https://www.cdc.gov/healthliteracy/learn/index.html (accessed March 25, 2021).
    1. Badarudeen S, Sabharwal S. Assessing readability of patient education materials: Current role in orthopaedics. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 468, Springer New York LLC; 2010, p. 2572–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1380-y. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schillinger D., Grumbach K., Piette J., Wang F., Osmond D., Daher C., et al. Association of health literacy with diabetes outcomes. J Am Med Assoc. 2002;288:475–482. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.4.475. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kutner M, Greenberg E, Jin Y, Paulsen C. The Health Literacy of America’s Adults: Results From the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy. 2003.

LinkOut - more resources