Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec;44(4):391-413.
doi: 10.1002/bewi.202100009. Epub 2021 Nov 23.

"Honecker's Vassal" or a Prehistorian in the Service of Science? The Evaluation of Former East German Scholarship and the Concept of the Scholar in the Debate on Joachim Herrmann in Reunified Germany

Anne Kluger  1   2
Affiliations

"Honecker's Vassal" or a Prehistorian in the Service of Science? The Evaluation of Former East German Scholarship and the Concept of the Scholar in the Debate on Joachim Herrmann in Reunified Germany

Anne Kluger. Ber Wiss. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

The evaluation and transformation process of the GDR research system in the wake of German reunification 1989/90 was immediately accompanied not only by debates within the scientific community, but also by an extensive discussion about the value and future perspectives of East German scholarship and its protagonists in the nationally circulated press. In 1990, the focus turned temporarily to the prominent East German prehistorian Joachim Herrmann after his election to the board of an international historical association. The article uses the example of Herrmann and the public discussion about him as a case study to examine the status of, and changes in, the authority of scholarship and the scholar in the context of the evaluation and restructuring of the East German research landscape in the early 1990s. A selection of press articles from nationwide German newspapers and newsmagazines, as well as archival letters exchanged between different participants in the debate serve as prisms carving out the central arguments and subjacent structures of the discussion. Therefore, Herrmann's case exposes generic characteristics of (different concepts of) scientific authority and the close connection between its negotiation and the search for identity in the newly reunited German academic sphere.

Keywords: GDR; Joachim Herrmann; prehistory; reunification; scholarship; scientific authority; the scholar; transformation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. [Anon.], “Häßliche Streifen: Ein altgedienter SED-Funktionär vertritt die westdeutschen Geschichtswissenschaftler international – zum Ärger der Zunft,” Der Spiegel, 24 September 1990.
    1. [Anon.], “Heiße Kartoffel: Die neue Akademie der Wissenschaften in Berlin wird von der politischen Vergangenheit ihrer Mitglieder aus der Ex-DDR belastet,” Der Spiegel, 7 January 1991.
    1. [Anon.], “Erneuerung: Kampfruf der modernen Inquisition,” neues deutschland, 5 June 1992.
    1. Ash, Mitchell G., “Wissenschaft und Politik als Ressourcen füreinander,” in Wissenschaften und Wissenschaftspolitik: Bestandsaufnahme zu Formationen, Brüchen und Kontinuitäten im Deutschland des 20. Jahrhunderts, ed. Rüdiger vom Bruch and Brigitte Kaderas (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 2002), 32–51.
    1. Ash, Mitchell G., “Pseudowissenschaft als historische Größe: Ein Abschlusskommentar,” in Pseudowissenschaft: Konzeptionen von Nichtwissenschaftlichkeit in der Wissenschaftsgeschichte, ed. Dirk Rupnow, Veronika Lipphardt, Jens Thiel, and Christina Wessely (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 2008), 451–460.

LinkOut - more resources