Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 20:805:150329.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150329. Epub 2021 Sep 15.

Energy-socio-economic-environmental modelling for the EU energy and post-COVID-19 transitions

Affiliations

Energy-socio-economic-environmental modelling for the EU energy and post-COVID-19 transitions

Ignacio Cazcarro et al. Sci Total Environ. .

Abstract

Relevant energy questions have arisen because of the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic shock leads to emissions' reductions consistent with the rates of decrease required to achieve the Paris Agreement goals. Those unforeseen drastic reductions in emissions are temporary as long as they do not involve structural changes. However, the COVID-19 consequences and the subsequent policy response will affect the economy for decades. Focusing on the EU, this discussion article argues how recovery plans are an opportunity to deepen the way towards a low-carbon economy, improving at the same time employment, health, and equity and the role of modelling tools. Long-term alignment with the low-carbon path and the development of a resilient transition towards renewable sources should guide instruments and policies, conditioning aid to energy-intensive sectors such as transport, tourism, and the automotive industry. However, the potential dangers of short-termism and carbon leakage persist. The current energy-socio-economic-environmental modelling tools are precious to widen the scope and deal with these complex problems. The scientific community has to assess disparate, non-equilibrium, and non-ordinary scenarios, such as sectors and countries lockdowns, drastic changes in consumption patterns, significant investments in renewable energies, and disruptive technologies and incorporate uncertainty analysis. All these instruments will evaluate the cost-effectiveness of decarbonization options and potential consequences on employment, income distribution, and vulnerability.

Keywords: Climate change; Energy transition; Energy-environmental modelling; Socio-economic modelling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Unlabelled Image
Graphical abstract

References

    1. Antal M., van den Bergh J.C.J.M. Re-spending rebound: a macro-level assessment for OECD countries and emerging economies. Energy Policy. 2014;68:585–590. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.11.016. - DOI
    1. Banacloche S., Gamarra A.R., Téllez F., Lechón Y. 2020. Market Uptake of Solar Thermal Electricity Through Cooperation Deliverable 9.1: Sustainability Assessment of Future CSP Cooperation Projects in Europe.
    1. Barbier E.B. How is the global green new deal going? Nature. 2010;464:832–833. doi: 10.1038/464832a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barbier E.B. UN Environment Programme; 2010. A Global Green New Deal: Rethinking the Economic Recovery.
    1. Bauhardt C. Solutions to the crisis? The green new deal, degrowth, and the solidarity economy: alternatives to the capitalist growth economy from an ecofeminist economics perspective. Ecol. Econ. 2014;102:60–68. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.03.015. - DOI