Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 24;10(1):301.
doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01846-8.

Communication strategies in the prevention of type 2 diabetes and gestational diabetes in vulnerable groups: a scoping review

Affiliations

Communication strategies in the prevention of type 2 diabetes and gestational diabetes in vulnerable groups: a scoping review

Jessica Breuing et al. Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: The global prevalence of diabetes is nearly 9%, with an upward trend in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and gestational diabetes (GDM). Although evidence shows that vulnerable groups are affected disproportionally, these groups are difficult to reach in terms of preventive measures. Currently, there is no gold standard regarding communication strategies and/or public awareness campaigns.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review in September 2019. Two reviewers independently screened the results of the electronic literature search in several databases, including Medline, EMBASE, and PsycINFO. Extracted data were charted, categorized, and summarized.

Results: All of the included articles (n=24) targeted T2DM; none targeted GDM. We identified the following five different vulnerable groups within the identified studies: migrants (n=9), ethnic groups such as African Americans (n=8), people with low socioeconomic status (n=3), older people (n=1), and people in need of care (n=1). Three categories of communication strategies were identified as follows: adapted diabetes prevention programs (n=21), community health workers (n=5), and technical approaches (n=9).

Conclusion: We found different approaches for preventive interventions for T2DM. Some of these approaches were already adapted to known barriers. Communication strategies should be adapted to barriers and facilitating factors to increase participation and motivation.

Keywords: Communication strategies; Prevention; Type 2 diabetes mellitus; Vulnerable groups.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart

References

    1. Ogurtsova K. dRFJ, Huang Y, Linnenkamp U, Guariguata L, Cho NH, Cavan D, Shaw JE, Makaroff LE: IDF diabetes atlas: global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017;128:40–50. - PubMed
    1. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel MB. Gabbe SG, Persson B, Buchanan TA, Catalano PA, Damm P, Dyer AR, Ad L, Hod M, Kitzmiler JL, Lowe LP, HD MI, Oats JJ, Omori Y, Schmidt MI. International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(3):676–682. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bommer CSV, Heesemann E, Manne-Goehler J, Atun R, Bärnighausen T, Davies J, Vollmer S. Global economic burden of diabetes in adults: projections from 2015 to 2030. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(5):963–970. - PubMed
    1. Association AD 5. Prevention or delay of type 2 diabetes: standards of medical care in diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care. 2018;41:51–54. - PubMed
    1. All Parliamentary Group for Diabetes and Diabetes UK . Diabetes and the disadvantaged: reducing health inequalities in the UK. 2006. pp. 1–23.

Publication types