Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 18:14:8437-8443.
doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S330960. eCollection 2021.

Different Cutoff Values for Increased Nuchal Translucency in First-Trimester Screening to Predict Fetal Chromosomal Abnormalities

Affiliations

Different Cutoff Values for Increased Nuchal Translucency in First-Trimester Screening to Predict Fetal Chromosomal Abnormalities

Linjuan Su et al. Int J Gen Med. .

Abstract

Introduction: Increased nuchal translucency (NT) is closely related to an increased risk of chromosomal abnormalities. However, the criterion of increased NT for invasive prenatal diagnosis remains controversial, as the cutoff values are inconsistent among countries. This study was conducted to compare the various cutoff values of increased NT and calculate the incidence of chromosomal abnormalities to determine the predictive ability of these cutoff values in conventional chromosome analysis.

Methods: A total of 3223 invasive samples with increased nuchal translucency (NT) or other non-ultrasound indications were collected from singleton pregnant women. Samples with isolated increased NT were divided into five groups based on the NT thickness: 909 samples in the NT ≥2.5 mm group, 819 samples in the NT ≥95th group, 547 samples in the NT ≥99th group, 527 samples in the NT ≥3.0 mm group, and 253 samples in the NT ≥3.5 mm group; 2301 samples with normal NT were considered as the control group. All five groups were karyotyped and the results were compared. The accuracy of the NT cutoff value for the screening of chromosomal abnormalities was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

Results: Detection of all chromosomal aberrations and trisomy 21 showed that the sensitivity and false-positive rate decreased sequentially in the NT ≥2.5 mm, NT ≥95th, NT ≥3 mm, NT ≥99th, and NT ≥3.5 mm groups, whereas the specificity, positive predictive value, and false-negative rates increased sequentially. Comprehensive analysis of various factors, including sensitivity and specificity, revealed values equal to or higher than the calculated 95th percentile of NT distribution, which showed a sensitivity of 49.2% and specificity of 75.67% for detecting all aneuploidies and a sensitivity of 64% and specificity of 75.45% for trisomy 21, exhibiting the highest ability for the screening of chromosomal defects in first-trimester screening.

Conclusion: For different thresholds of NT thickness, values equal to or higher than the calculated 95th percentile of the NT distribution showed the highest ability for the screening of chromosomal defects in first-trimester screening.

Keywords: chromosomal abnormalities; crown-rump length; cutoff value; first-trimester screening; invasive prenatal diagnosis; nuchal translucency; trisomy 21.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Effectiveness of screening for chromosomal aberrations using different cutoff values for fetal nuchal translucency (NT). ROC curve of NT: NT ≥2.5 mm: area under the curve (AUC) = 0.619, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.571–0.667, P < 0.0001. NT ≥95th: AUC = 0.624, 95% CI = 0.575–0.672, P < 0.0001. NT ≥99th: AUC = 0.610, 95% CI = 0.560–0.660, P < 0.0001. NT ≥3.0 mm: AUC = 0.616, 95% CI = 0.566–0.666, P < 0.0001. NT ≥3.5 mm: AUC = 0.599, 95% CI = 0.548–0.651, P < 0.0001.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effectiveness of screening for trisomy 21 using diffident cutoff values of fetal nuchal translucency (NT). ROC curve of NT: NT ≥2.5 mm: area under the curve (AUC) = 0.692, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.630–0.755, P < 0.0001. NT ≥95th: AUC = 0.700, 95% CI = 0.637–0.755, P < 0.0001. NT ≥ 99th: AUC = 0.682, 95% CI = 0.614–0.751, P < 0.0001. NT ≥3.0 mm: AUC = 0.679, 95% CI = 0.610–0.748, P < 0.0001. NT ≥3.5 mm: AUC = 0.642, 95% CI = 0.569–0.714, P < 0.0001.

References

    1. Giorlandino C, Cignini P, Padula F, et al. Effects of exogenous progesterone on fetal nuchal translucency: an observational prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212:335.e1-e7. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baer RJ, Norton ME, Shaw GM, et al. Risk of selected structural abnormalities in infants after increased nuchal translucency measurement. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211:675 e1–19. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.025 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kagan KO, Avgidou K, Molina FS, et al. Relation between increased fetal nuchal translucency thickness and chromosomal defects. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:6–10. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000191301.63871.c6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Syngelaki A, Guerra L, Ceccacci I, et al. Impact of holoprosencephaly, exomphalos, megacystis and increased nuchal translucency on first‐trimester screening for chromosomal abnormalities. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;50:45–48. doi:10.1002/uog.17286 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wulff CB, Gerds TA, Rode L, et al. The risk of fetal loss associated with invasive testing following combined first trimester risk screening for Down syndrome - a national cohort of 147 987 singleton pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstetr Gynecol. 2016;47:38–44. doi:10.1002/uog.15820 - DOI - PubMed