Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 8:12:761763.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.761763. eCollection 2021.

Baicalin Enhanced Oral Bioavailability of Sorafenib in Rats by Inducing Intestine Absorption

Affiliations

Baicalin Enhanced Oral Bioavailability of Sorafenib in Rats by Inducing Intestine Absorption

Jingyao Wei et al. Front Pharmacol. .

Abstract

Background: Sorafenib (SOR) is an oral, potent, selective, irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) used as the first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Baicalin (BG) is used as adjuvant therapy for hepatitis, which accounts for the leading cause of the development of HCC, and is commonly coadministered with SOR in clinic. The purpose of the current study was to characterize the pharmacokinetic changes of SOR and the potential mechanism when SOR is administered concomitantly with BG in rats for single and multiple doses. Methods: Parallel randomized pharmacokinetic studies were performed in rats which received SOR (50 mg/kg, i.g.) alone or coadministered with BG (160 mg/kg, i.g.) for single and multiple doses (7 days). Plasma SOR levels were quantified by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). Rat liver microsomes (RLMs) which isolated from their livers were analyzed for CYP3A and SOR metabolism activities. The inhibitory effect of BG on the metabolism of SOR was also assessed in pooled human liver microsomes (HLMs). The effects of BG on the intestine absorption behaviors of SOR were assessed in the in situ single-pass rat intestinal perfusion model. Results: Coadministration with BG (160 mg/kg, i.g.) for single or multiple doses significantly increased the Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ of orally administered SOR by 1.68-, 1.73-, 1.70-fold and 2.02-, 1.65-, 1.66- fold in male rats and by 1.85-, 1.68-, 1.68-fold and 1.57-, 1.25-, 1.24- fold in female rats, respectively (p < 0.01 or p < 0.05). In vitro incubation assays demonstrated that there were no significant differences of K m , V max , and CL int of 1-OH MDZ and SOR N-oxide in RLMs between control and multiple doses of BG-treated groups. BG has no obvious inhibitory effects on the metabolism of SOR in HLMs. In comparison with SOR alone, combining with BG significantly increased the permeability coefficient (P eff ) and absorption rate constant (K a ) of the SOR in situ single-pass rat intestinal perfusion model. Conclusion: Notably enhanced oral bioavailability of SOR by combination with BG in rats may mainly account for BG-induced SOR absorption. A greater understanding of potential DDIs between BG and SOR in rats makes major contributions to clinical rational multidrug therapy in HCC patients. Clinical trials in humans and HCC patients need to be further confirmed in the subsequent study.

Keywords: baicalin; bioavailability; drug–drug interactions; in situ single-pass rat intestinal perfusion model; sorafenib.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Mean plasma concentration–time profiles of SOR in male (A) and female (B) rats following oral administration of SOR (50 mg/kg, i.g.) with a single dose of BG (160 mg/kg, i.g.). Data are presented as mean ± SD. Six rats were used for each data point in both control and BG treatment groups (n = 6).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Mean plasma concentration–time profiles of SOR in male (A) and female (B) rats following SOR administration (50 mg/kg, i.g.) orally together with multiple doses of BG (160 mg/kg, i.g) for seven consecutive days. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Six rats were used for each data point in both control and BG treatment groups (n = 6).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Kinetics of formation of 1-OH MDZ in female (A) and male (B) rat liver microsomes. Data represent the means ± SD of six independent experiments in duplicate determinations.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Kinetics of formation of Sorafenib N-oxide in female (A) and male (B) liver microsomes. Data represent the means ± SD of six independent experiments in duplicate determinations.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Kinetics of formation of sorafenib N-oxide in pooled human liver microsomes (A) and the effect of BG on the metabolic activity of SOR in pooled HLMs (B). Data represent the means ± SD of three independent experiments in duplicate determinations.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
P eff (A) and K a (B) of SOR in situ single-pass rat intestinal perfusion experiments. Data represent the means ± SD of three independent experiments in duplicate determinations. Differences significantly compared with control: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agarwal S., Elmquist W. F. (2012). Insight into the Cooperation of P-Glycoprotein (ABCB1) and Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (ABCG2) at the Blood-Brain Barrier: a Case Study Examining Sorafenib Efflux Clearance. Mol. Pharm. 9 (3), 678–684. 10.1021/mp200465c - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allard M., Khoudour N., Rousseau B., Joly C., Costentin C., Blanchet B., et al. (2017). Simultaneous Analysis of Regorafenib and Sorafenib and Three of Their Metabolites in Human Plasma Using LC-MS/MS. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 142, 42–48. 10.1016/j.jpba.2017.04.053 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alqahtani S., Mohamed L. A., Kaddoumi A. (2013). Experimental Models for Predicting Drug Absorption and Metabolism. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 9 (10), 1241–1254. 10.1517/17425255.2013.802772 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Awada A., Hendlisz A., Christensen O., Lathia C. D., Bartholomeus S., Lebrun F., et al. (2012). Phase I Trial to Investigate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of Sorafenib Combined with Docetaxel in Patients with Advanced Refractory Solid Tumours. Eur. J. Cancer 48 (4), 465–474. 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.12.026 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bae S., D'Cunha R., Shao J., An G. (2018). Effect of 5,7-dimethoxyflavone on Bcrp1-Mediated Transport of Sorafenib In Vitro and In Vivo in Mice. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 117, 27–34. 10.1016/j.ejps.2018.02.004 - DOI - PubMed