Impact of establishing a specialized hepatobiliary unit on liver resections in a non-specialized tertiary centre in regional Australia
- PMID: 34820998
- DOI: 10.1111/ans.17383
Impact of establishing a specialized hepatobiliary unit on liver resections in a non-specialized tertiary centre in regional Australia
Abstract
Background: In April 2018, a dedicated hepatobiliary unit was established in a tertiary hospital in North Queensland. Changes included the employment of a hepatobiliary-trained surgeon, centralized referrals, and formalized multidisciplinary team meetings. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of establishing a hepatobiliary unit on outcomes after liver resection, in a regional centre where such procedures were previously performed by non-specialist general surgeons.
Methods: Adult patients who underwent elective liver resection in Townsville from 2013 to 2020 were included in the study. Outcomes after liver resection were collected across two study periods - before and after the hepatobiliary unit was established. The primary end points were a before and after comparison of the 90-day morbidity and mortality and the R1 margin rates.
Results: Across the two study periods, 76 and 77 patients, respectively, underwent liver resection. Rates of R1 resection, 90-day mortality and major complications were not significantly different between the two study periods. Primary tumours (14.5% before versus 50.6% after) and cirrhosis (1.3% before versus 14.3% after) were significantly higher in the latter period, as was the median length of stay (4 days before versus 6 days after). Annual surgical volume increased by 75% in the period after 2018 compared to the 5 years preceding it.
Conclusion: Establishing a centralized hepatobiliary unit in a tertiary regional centre resulted in increased surgical volume and case complexity, with no change in early outcomes after liver resection. Overall, this dedicated unit improved the accessibility of a subspecialty surgical service in regional Australia.
Keywords: Australia; general surgery; hepatectomy; rural health services; specialization.
© 2021 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.
References
-
- Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. Annual Activities Report 2019 [PDF on Internet]. Melbourne: Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, 2020. [cited 10 Jan 2021]. Available from URL: https://www.surgeons.org/-/media/Project/RACS/surgeons-org/files/reports....
-
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia's health 2018 [PDF on Internet]. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2018 [cited 10 Jan 2021]. Report No.: AUS221. Available from URL: https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/0c0bc98b-5e4d-4826-af7f-b300731fb447/ai....
-
- Tulloh B, Clifforth S, Miller I. Caseload in rural general surgical practice and implications for training. ANZ J. Surg. 2001; 71: 215-7.
-
- Dixon E, Vollmer CM, Bathe O, Sutherland F. Training, practice, and referral patterns in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: survey of general surgeons. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2005; 9: 109-14.
-
- Granger SR, Glasgow RE, Battaglia J et al. Development of a dedicated hepatopancreaticobiliary program in a university hospital system. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2005; 9: 891-5.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous