Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 24;23(11):e22934.
doi: 10.2196/22934.

Artificial Intelligence for Skin Cancer Detection: Scoping Review

Abdulrahman Takiddin  1   2 , Jens Schneider  2 , Yin Yang  2 , Alaa Abd-Alrazaq  2 , Mowafa Househ  2
Affiliations

Artificial Intelligence for Skin Cancer Detection: Scoping Review

Abdulrahman Takiddin et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Skin cancer is the most common cancer type affecting humans. Traditional skin cancer diagnosis methods are costly, require a professional physician, and take time. Hence, to aid in diagnosing skin cancer, artificial intelligence (AI) tools are being used, including shallow and deep machine learning-based methodologies that are trained to detect and classify skin cancer using computer algorithms and deep neural networks.

Objective: The aim of this study was to identify and group the different types of AI-based technologies used to detect and classify skin cancer. The study also examined the reliability of the selected papers by studying the correlation between the data set size and the number of diagnostic classes with the performance metrics used to evaluate the models.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search for papers using Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Xplore, Association for Computing Machinery Digital Library (ACM DL), and Ovid MEDLINE databases following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. The studies included in this scoping review had to fulfill several selection criteria: being specifically about skin cancer, detecting or classifying skin cancer, and using AI technologies. Study selection and data extraction were independently conducted by two reviewers. Extracted data were narratively synthesized, where studies were grouped based on the diagnostic AI techniques and their evaluation metrics.

Results: We retrieved 906 papers from the 3 databases, of which 53 were eligible for this review. Shallow AI-based techniques were used in 14 studies, and deep AI-based techniques were used in 39 studies. The studies used up to 11 evaluation metrics to assess the proposed models, where 39 studies used accuracy as the primary evaluation metric. Overall, studies that used smaller data sets reported higher accuracy.

Conclusions: This paper examined multiple AI-based skin cancer detection models. However, a direct comparison between methods was hindered by the varied use of different evaluation metrics and image types. Performance scores were affected by factors such as data set size, number of diagnostic classes, and techniques. Hence, the reliability of shallow and deep models with higher accuracy scores was questionable since they were trained and tested on relatively small data sets of a few diagnostic classes.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; deep neural networks; machine learning; skin cancer; skin lesion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Similarity of normal lesion (left) and melanoma (right).
Figure 2
Figure 2
PRISMA approach. ACM DL: Association for Computing Machinery Digital Library; AI: artificial intelligence; IEEE: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; PRISMA: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Number of published papers by year.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Number of published papers by region.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Number of published papers by number of diagnostic classes used.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Effect of the number of diagnostic classes and data set size on accuracy.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ray A, Gupta A, Al A. Skin lesion classification with deep convolutional neural network: process development and validation. JMIR Dermatol. 2020 May 7;3(1):e18438. doi: 10.2196/18438. - DOI
    1. de Carvalho TM, Noels E, Wakkee M, Udrea A, Nijsten T. Development of smartphone apps for skin cancer risk assessment: progress and promise. JMIR Dermatol. 2019 Jul 11;2(1):e13376. doi: 10.2196/13376. - DOI
    1. Loescher LJ, Janda M, Soyer HP, Shea K, Curiel-Lewandrowski C. Advances in skin cancer early detection and diagnosis. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2013 Aug;29(3):170–81. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2013.06.003.S0749-2081(13)00033-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lieber CA, Majumder SK, Ellis DL, Billheimer DD, Mahadevan-Jansen A. In vivo nonmelanoma skin cancer diagnosis using Raman microspectroscopy. Lasers Surg Med. 2008 Sep;40(7):461–467. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20653. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/18727020 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Murphy R. Introduction to AI Robotics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2019.

Publication types