Medawar and Hamilton on the selective forces in the evolution of ageing
- PMID: 34822012
- PMCID: PMC8616860
- DOI: 10.1007/s40656-021-00476-6
Medawar and Hamilton on the selective forces in the evolution of ageing
Abstract
Both Medawar and Hamilton contributed key ideas to the modern evolutionary theory of ageing. In particular, they both suggested that, in populations with overlapping generations, the force with which selection acts on traits declines with the age at which traits are expressed. This decline would eventually cause ageing to evolve. However, the biological literature diverges on the relationship between Medawar's analysis of the force of selection and Hamilton's. Some authors appear to believe that Hamilton perfected Medawar's insightful, yet ultimately erroneous analysis of this force, while others see Hamilton's analysis as a coherent development of, or the obvious complement to Medawar's. Here, the relationship between the two analyses is revisited. Two things are argued for. First, most of Medawar's alleged errors that Hamilton would had rectified seem not to be there. The origin of these perceived errors appears to be in a misinterpretation of Medawar's writings. Second, the mathematics of Medawar and that of Hamilton show a significant overlap. However, different meanings are attached to the same mathematical expression. Medawar put forth an expression for the selective force on age-specific fitness. Hamilton proposed a full spectrum of selective forces each operating on age-specific fitness components, i.e. mortality and fertility. One of Hamilton's expressions, possibly his most important, is of the same form as Medawar's expression. But Hamilton's selective forces on age-specific fitness components do not add up to yield Medawar's selective force on age-specific fitness. It is concluded that Hamilton's analysis should be considered neither as a correction to Medawar's analysis nor as its obvious complement.
Keywords: Age; Reproductive value; Senescence; Theory.
© 2021. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Longevity and the drift barrier: Bridging the gap between Medawar and Hamilton.Evol Lett. 2020 May 24;4(4):382-393. doi: 10.1002/evl3.173. eCollection 2020 Aug. Evol Lett. 2020. PMID: 32774886 Free PMC article.
-
Shattered: Medawar's test tubes and their enduring legacy of chaos.Med Hypotheses. 2000 Feb;54(2):326-39. doi: 10.1054/mehy.1999.0856. Med Hypotheses. 2000. PMID: 10790771
-
Evolution of ageing since Darwin.J Genet. 2008 Dec;87(4):363-71. doi: 10.1007/s12041-008-0059-6. J Genet. 2008. PMID: 19147926
-
Hamilton's rule and the causes of social evolution.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Mar 31;369(1642):20130362. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0362. Print 2014 May 19. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014. PMID: 24686934 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Medawar's legacy to cellular immunology and clinical transplantation: a commentary on Billingham, Brent and Medawar (1956) 'Quantitative studies on tissue transplantation immunity. III. Actively acquired tolerance'.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Apr 19;370(1666):20140382. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0382. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015. PMID: 25750245 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Dying occurs as a defined molecular progression in Drosophila rather than as nonspecific physiological collapse.iScience. 2025 Jul 14;28(8):113115. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.113115. eCollection 2025 Aug 15. iScience. 2025. PMID: 40755455 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Abrams PA. The fitness costs of senescence: The evolutionary importance of events in early adult life. Evolutionary Ecology. 1991;5(4):343–360.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources