Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;16(1):171-182.
doi: 10.1007/s12072-021-10266-8. Epub 2021 Nov 25.

Impact of compensated cirrhosis on survival in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure

Collaborators, Affiliations

Impact of compensated cirrhosis on survival in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure

Kessarin Thanapirom et al. Hepatol Int. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Background and aims: Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is considered a main prognostic event in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). We analyzed the 28-day and 90-day mortality in ACLF patients with or without underlying cirrhosis enrolled in the ACLF Research Consortium (AARC) database.

Methods: A total of 1,621 patients were prospectively enrolled and 637 (39.3%) of these patients had cirrhosis. Baseline characteristics, complications and mortality were compared between patients with and without cirrhosis.

Results: Alcohol consumption was more common in cirrhosis than non-cirrhosis (66.4% vs. 44.2%, p < 0.0001), while non-alcoholic fatty liver disease/cryptogenic CLD (10.9% vs 5.8%, p < 0.0001) and chronic HBV reactivation (18.8% vs 11.8%, p < 0.0001) were more common in non-cirrhosis. Only 0.8% of patients underwent liver transplantation. Overall, 28-day and 90-day mortality rates were 39.3% and 49.9%, respectively. Patients with cirrhosis had a greater chance of survival compared to those without cirrhosis both at 28-day (HR = 0.48; 95% CI 0.36-0.63, p < 0.0001) and 90-day (HR = 0.56; 95% CI 0.43-0.72, p < 0.0001), respectively. In alcohol CLD, non-cirrhosis patients had a higher 28-day (49.9% vs. 23.6%, p < 0.001) and 90-day (58.4% vs. 35.2%, p < 0.001) mortality rate than cirrhosis patients. ACLF patients with cirrhosis had longer mean survival than non-cirrhosis patients (25.5 vs. 18.8 days at 28-day and 65.2 vs. 41.2 days at 90-day). Exaggerated systemic inflammation might be the reason why non-cirrhosis patients had a poorer prognosis than those with cirrhosis after ACLF had occurred.

Conclusions: The 28-day and 90-day mortality rates of ACLF patients without cirrhosis were significantly higher than those with cirrhosis in alcoholic CLD. The presence of cirrhosis and its stage should be evaluated at baseline to guide for management. Thai Clinical Trials Registry, TCTR20191226002.

Keywords: Acute-on-chronic liver failure; Chronic liver disease; Cirrhosis; Liver injury; Mortality; Prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Kessarin Thanapirom, Tongluk Teerasarntipan, Sombat Treeprasertsuk, Ashok Choudhury, Manoj K Sahu, Rakhi Maiwall, Viniyendra Pamecha, Richard Moreau, Mamun Al Mahtab, Yogesh Kumar Chawla, Harshad Devarbhavi, Chen Yu, Qin Ning, Deepak Amarapurkar, Chundamannil E. Eapen, Saeed Sadiq Hamid, Amna Subhan Butt, Dong Joon Kim, Guan H. Lee, Ajit Sood, Laurentious A. Lesmana, Zaigham Abbas, Gamal Shiha, Diana A Payawal , Man-Fung Yuen, Albert Chan, George Lau, Jidong Jia, Salimur Rahman, Barjesh C Sharma, Osamu Yokosuka, Shiv Kumar Sarin have nothing to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) flowchart of patient enrolment
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Survival according to the presence of cirrhosis or non-cirrhosis in patients with ACLF at 28 days and 90 days. a Survival curves at 28 days (Log Rank Chi-Square = 79.5; p < 0.0001). b Survival curves at 90 days (Log Rank Chi-Square = 73.3; p < 0.0001)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gustot T, Fernandez J, Garcia E, et al. Clinical course of acute-on-chronic liver failure syndrome and effects on prognosis. Hepatology. 2015;6 2(1):243–252. doi: 10.1002/hep.27849. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zheng YX, Zhong X, Li YJ, et al. Performance of scoring systems to predict mortality of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017. (Epub 2017/03/18). - PubMed
    1. Antunes AG, Teixeira C, Vaz AM, et al. Comparison of the prognostic value of Chronic Liver Failure Consortium scores and traditional models for predicting mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;40(4):276–285. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2017.01.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sarin SK, Kedarisetty CK, Abbas Z, et al. Acute-on-chronic liver failure: consensus recommendations of the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) 2014. Hep Intl. 2014;8(4):453–471. doi: 10.1007/s12072-014-9580-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hernaez R, Sola E, Moreau R, et al. Acute-on-chronic liver failure: an update. Gut. 2017;66(3):541–553. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312670. - DOI - PMC - PubMed