Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Feb;20(2):409-421.
doi: 10.1111/jth.15607. Epub 2021 Dec 13.

An update on the global use of risk assessment models and thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients with medical illnesses from the World Thrombosis Day steering committee: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

An update on the global use of risk assessment models and thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients with medical illnesses from the World Thrombosis Day steering committee: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Gabor Forgo et al. J Thromb Haemost. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Introduction: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The majority of VTE events are hospital-associated. In 2008, the Epidemiologic International Day for the Evaluation of Patients at Risk for Venous Thromboembolism in the Acute Hospital Care Setting (ENDORSE) multinational cross-sectional study reported that only approximately 40% of medical patients at risk of VTE received adequate thromboprophylaxis.

Methods: In our systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed at providing updated figures concerning the use of thromboprophylaxis globally. We focused on: (a) the frequency of patients with an indication to thromboprophylaxis according with individual models; (b) the use of adequate thromboprophylaxis; and (c) reported contraindications to thromboprophylaxis. Observational nonrandomized studies or surveys focusing on medically ill patients were considered eligible.

Results: After screening, we included 27 studies from 20 countries for a total of 137 288 patients. Overall, 50.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 41.9-59.1, I2 99%) of patients had an indication to thromboprophylaxis: of these, 54.5% (95% CI: 46.2-62.6, I2 99%) received adequate thromboprophylaxis. The use of adequate thromboprophylaxis was 66.8% in Europe (95% CI: 50.7-81.1, I2 98%), 44.9% in Africa (95% CI: 31.8-58.4, I2 96%), 37.6% in Asia (95% CI: 25.7-50.3, I2 97%), 58.3% in South America (95% CI: 31.1-83.1, I2 99%), and 68.6% in North America (95% CI: 64.9-72.6, I2 96%). No major differences in adequate thromboprophylaxis use were found across risk assessment models. Bleeding, thrombocytopenia, and renal/hepatic failure were the most frequently reported contraindications to thromboprophylaxis.

Conclusions: The use of anticoagulants for VTE prevention has been proven effective and safe, but thromboprophylaxis prescriptions are still unsatisfactory among hospitalized medically ill patients around the globe with marked geographical differences.

Keywords: World Thrombosis Day; epidemiology; thromboprophylaxis; thrombosis; venous thromboembolism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Barco has received honoraria from Boston Scientific, Concept Medical, INARI, Bayer, LeoPharma; institutional grants from Sanofi, Bard, Bentley, Concept Medical, Boston Scientific, Concept Medical; and support for congress participation and travel from Daiichi Sankyo and Bayer. Dr. Áinle: research grants (paid to university): Bayer, Daiichi‐Sankyo, Actelion, Leo Pharma. Dr. Ageno has received research support from Bayer and honoraria from Aspen, Bayer, BMS/Pfizer, Leo Pharma, Norgine, Sanofi, Daiichi Sankyo. Dr. Castellucci has received honoraria from Bayer, BMS‐Pfizer Alliance, The Academy, LEO Pharma, Sanofi, and Servier; she holds a Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada National New Investigator Award, and a Tier 2 research Chair in Thrombosis and Anticoagulation Safety from the University of Ottawa. The other authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Patients classified at a high risk of VTE according to risk assessment models or ACCP criteria (all studies). ACCP, American College of Chest Physicians; VTE, venous thromboembolism
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Adequate thromboprophylaxis use among high‐risk patients according with the Padua Prediction score
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Adequate thromboprophylaxis use among high‐risk patients according with the ACCP criteria. ACCP, American College of Chest Physicians
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Adequate thromboprophylaxis use among high‐risk patients according with the Caprini score
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Geographical differences in thromboprophylaxis use

References

    1. Wendelboe AM, Raskob GE. Global burden of thrombosis: epidemiologic aspects. Circ Res. 2016;118(9):1340‐1347. - PubMed
    1. Barco S, Valerio L, Gallo A, et al. Global reporting of pulmonary embolism‐related deaths in the World Health Organization mortality database: vital registration data from 123 countries. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2021;5(5):e12520. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Raskob GE, Spyropoulos AC, Cohen AT, et al. Association between asymptomatic proximal deep vein thrombosis and mortality in acutely Ill medical patients. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10(5):e019459. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barco S, Woersching AL, Spyropoulos AC, Piovella F, Mahan CE. European Union‐28: an annualised cost‐of‐illness model for venous thromboembolism. Thromb Haemost. 2016;115(4):800‐808. - PubMed
    1. Pandor A, Tonkins M, Goodacre S, et al. Risk assessment models for venous thromboembolism in hospitalised adult patients: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2021;11(7):e045672. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms