Recognizing and Mitigating Canine Stress during Animal Assisted Interventions
- PMID: 34822627
- PMCID: PMC8623698
- DOI: 10.3390/vetsci8110254
Recognizing and Mitigating Canine Stress during Animal Assisted Interventions
Abstract
Animal-assisted Interventions (AAI) proliferated rapidly since clinicians and researchers first noted the positive effects animals have on people struggling with physical and mental health concerns. The intersection of AAI with the field of animal welfare evolved from considering animals' basic needs, such as freedom from pain, to recognition that animals experience nuanced emotions. Current conceptualizations of the various roles of companion animals as an adjunct to treatments for humans emphasize not only the animals' physical comfort and autonomy, but also their mental well-being and enjoyment of AAI activities. However, numerous challenges to effective monitoring of animals involved in AAI exist. This article focuses specifically on dogs, highlighting factors that may lead handlers and therapists to miss or ignore canine stress signals during human-animal interactions and offers strategies to recognize and ameliorate dogs' distress more consistently. The primary goals of this discussion are to summarize the current thinking on canine well-being and to highlight practical applications of animal welfare principles in real-world AAI settings. The paper highlights contextual factors (e.g., physical setting, patient demand), human influences (e.g., desire to help), and intervention characteristics (e.g., presence or absence of a dog-specific advocate) that may promote or inhibit humans' ability to advocate for therapy dogs during AAI activities. Deidentified examples of each of these factors are discussed, and recommendations are provided to mitigate factors that interfere with timely recognition and amelioration of canine distress.
Keywords: animal-assisted activities; animal-assisted interventions; animal-assisted therapy; canine agency; canine stress; intervention characteristics; stress mitigation; therapy dogs.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest. In the past 36 months, Townsend’s spouse has received research support, acted as a consultant and/or has received honoraria from Acadia, Adamas, Aevi, Afecta, Akili, Alkermes, Allergan, American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, American Psychiatric Press, Arbor, Axsome, Daiichi–Sankyo, Emelex, Gedeon Richter, Genentech, Idorsia, Intra-Cellular Therapies, Kempharm, Luminopia, Lundbeck, MedAvante-ProPhase, Merck, MJH Life Sciences, NIH, Neurim, Otsuka, PaxMedica, PCORI, Pfizer, Physicians Postgraduate Press, Q BioMed, Receptor Life Sciences, Roche, Sage, Signant Health, Sunovion, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Syneos, Syneurx, Takeda, Teva, Tris, and Validus.
References
-
- The Fascinating History of Animal-Assisted Therapy. [(accessed on 15 July 2021)]. Available online: https://www.healthcarebusinesstoday.com/the-fascinating-history-of-anima...
-
- Levinson B.M., Mallon G.P. Pet-Oriented Child Psychotherapy. Charles C. Thomas Publisher, Ltd.; Springfield, IL, USA: 1997.
-
- Jegatheesan B., Beetz A., Ormerod E., Johnson R., Fine A., Yamazaki K., Dudzik C., Garcia R.M., Winkle M., Choi G. The IAHAIO definitions for animal assisted intervention and guidelines for wellness of animals involved in AAI. In: Fine A.H., editor. Handbook on Animal-Assisted Therapy. 5th ed. Elsevier Academic Press; London, UK: 2019. pp. 500–501.
-
- Eaton-Stull Y., Flynn B. Animal-assisted crisis response. In: Yeager K.R., Roberts A.R., editors. Crisis Intervention Handbook: Assessment, Treatment, and Research. 4th ed. Oxford University Press; Oxford, UK: 2015. pp. 599–606.
-
- Animal-Assisted Crisis Response National Standards. [(accessed on 22 July 2021)]. Available online: https://www.hopeaacr.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/AACRNationalStandard....
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
